Search for: "Major Moore" Results 2281 - 2300 of 2,524
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2008, 7:29 am
The Court of Appeal then divided (Rix LJ and Clarke MR for the majority, Moore-Bick LJ in the minority) on the standard of proof to be applied in those exceptional cases where an injunction might be appropriate. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 6:43 pm
In fact, as Judge Moore notes in her dissent, the information known to the police was that he kept guns at someone else's house or in his car (where a gun was found by police in a separate incident during the time in question). [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 8:27 am
What major life activity does smoking or nicotine addiction materially restrict? [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 11:36 am
Because that is number needed to make the Democratic majority filibuster-proof. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 11:02 am
Michael Moore has a terrific piece this week outlining the various bills that are likely to get debated after the election. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 1:14 am
A lot of different stuff out in the LexBlogosphere today, including a very insightful post by Michael Moore, who offers an employer's guide to the upcoming election. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 10:02 pm
Last week, Moore & Van Allen laid off around 20 staff members. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:44 am
He takes on the three major monotheistic religions (and others), but curiously doesn't skewer other religions such as Buddhism or Hinduism, among many others. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 1:42 pm
Neither the majority nor even the minority saw the case as involving in any primary sense the President's authority in foreign affairs. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
App. 1979) (a federal decision supports case-by-case).Iowa: Moore v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 11:25 pm
A panel of three judges (Judges Gajarsa, Moore, and Linn) heard the case at the Federal Circuit. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 5:48 pm
It appears most of these groups were created before the primary in May, and the majority of candidates lost. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 5:43 pm
[that concludes] The majority seemingly takes the view that a claimant need only advance "some" type of constitutional claim and succeed on a non-related state claim to become entitled to attorneys' fees under Section 1988, regardless of any failure to prove the constitutional claim or even make a showing that the federal claims were substantial. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 10:45 am
In this great democracy, we cannot let there be one set of rules for the vast majority of hard-working citizens, and another set of rules for the elite, who, when they screw up, are handed one more gift on a silver platter. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 9:54 am
"We're really in uncharted territory here," Evan Chesler (pictured), presiding partner of Cravath Swaine & Moore, said of litigation that could emerge from government takeovers of financial institutions like insurance giant AIG.Chesler said a certain amount of litigation would be likely to focus on actions taken by companies before the Government became involved. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 6:28 pm
Here's our question for Threat Level readers: Do you have a budding Ken Burns, Michael Moore or Floyd Brown inside of you? [read post]