Search for: "PAUL C. MAY" Results 2281 - 2300 of 2,982
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2012, 6:26 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
Participants may explore topics such as: legal discourse and imperial ideologies; the establishment of colonial jurisdictions in Canada, Louisiana, and the French West Indies; the regulation of slavery; indigenous peoples and the law; the emergence of colonial land tenures; and the legal framework for trade and business enterprise. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 3:44 am by SHG
This one caught fire and so it became a cause célèbre for Black Lives Matter. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 9:07 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
Éric Wyler, Le concept d’acceptabilité du Jus auctoritas au cœur de la juridiction internationale ? [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 6:31 am by Douglas
Segundo o delegado Paul Henry Verduraz, há a suspeita de Risseto ter obtido doações e bolsas de estudo ilegalmente. [read post]
1 May 2013, 9:00 am by The Book Review Editor
  I then speculate that President Obama is losing support for his drone wars at home because “he committed the same sins” as the Bush administration, namely, (a) excessive secrecy, (b) the failure to secure congressional support, and (c) excessive reliance on secret legal interpretation to expand wars abroad. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 4:35 am by Lawrence Higgins
Comments may be submitted by sending an e-mail to evidence@cand.uscourts.gov before 5:00 p.m. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
Consequently, there is a lingering misapprehension that anything at all can be posted concerning another person over the internet – no matter how defamatory or scandalous the uploaded material may be – and that the posted material will enjoy a complete immunity. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:18 am
Well, Anthony Comstock may be long gone, but we still have obscenity crimes. [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Intitulé : Racicot c. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 5:17 pm by Eugene Volokh
" Because section 223(a)(1)(C) criminalizes speech, it "must be interpreted with the commands of the First Amendment clearly in mind. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 10:10 am by azatty
“Instead of the bosses merely handing out A’s and C’s, they work to make sure everyone can earn an A. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps writes that the case “may finally resolve the question of whether a citizen can ignore or even talk back to police officers without fear of consequences. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:30 pm by Josh Wright
Edelman, Assistant Professor of Business Administration, Harvard Business School Randal C. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 11:42 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
A new “Persons” case on December 18, 2014, from an Argentinian court, suggests that the qualifications for being a person may be expanded further. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 9:08 am by Monique Altheim
Paul announces ‘historic’ class-action suit over NSA spying. [read post]