Search for: "PIERCE v. PIERCE"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 2,337
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2007, 2:00 am
A2979 Townsend (MS) -- Relates to the power of courts to deny orders of recognizance or bail where the defendant poses a risk of danger to the community
No Same as
BLURB : CP L. bail or recognizance; denia
First Act: 01/22/07 referred to codes
Last Act: 04/17/07 held for consideration in codes
A3657 Kirwan (MS) -- Requires lifetime post-release supervision for certain offenders; prohibits good behavior allowances against certain… [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 8:06 am
Harper v. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 1:16 am
A new case from the North Carolina Court of Appeals appears to support this.In Babb v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 10:30 pm
Law students enrolled in a "substantive" criminal procedure course frequently sweat over the intricacies of search and seizure law within contexts familiar to the average land-lubber attorney - the home, the automobile, and the person strolling down the street. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 6:23 am
The April 9th Court of Appeals opinion in A.B. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 6:13 am
Pierce Manufacturing, Inc. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 11:02 pm
State v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 11:09 am
Making news in the main stream media is A.B. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 1:21 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKAlternative Dispute Resolution$12.5 Million Arbitration Award to Brokers For Defamation Claim Stands Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 11:28 am
Cameron v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 7:51 pm
[9] See generally Walt Disney Prods. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 1:10 am
In Morris v. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 5:51 am
Relying on Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 12:48 am
" Lawrence v. [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 12:08 pm
Lessin v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 3:10 pm
Pierce spoke about the challenges for SSP specifically and "structured settlement planning" (Pierce's term) stakeholders more generally in developing standards of professional conduct. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 11:23 pm
" These terms are broadly defined, and would undoubtedly reach roads (Pierce County v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 4:28 am
The case is Xie v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 2:29 pm
If they functioned the way the cost-plus crowd hypothesizes, I could afford my own Gulfstream V, Provence villa, and 5-bedroom penthouse with Central Park views: After all, I just increased my "costs," so the workings of the market would appropriately subsidize me on the wage side, right? [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 5:29 pm
Anderson v. [read post]
