Search for: "People v David S." Results 2281 - 2300 of 5,858
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The courts that do require subjective intent often rely on the Supreme Court’s 2003 ruling in Virginia v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
I argued that although removing the initiative’s provisions from the books would certainly be a good thing, the legislature lacked the power to effect repeal on its own; respect for the initiative process requires that the people themselves formally weigh in on any proposed repeal. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 8:06 am by James Bopp and Richard Coleson
We focus on abortion jurisprudence because that was at issue in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:00 am by Adam Wagner
Updated | SG v St Gregory’s Catholic Science College [2011] EWHC 1452 (Admin) (17 June 2010) – Read judgment Most people have their first taste of injustice at school. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 11:28 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  A few months ago, people like me were saying: "Why are so many people rejecting the Covid vaccine requirements for schools, when we have many vaccine requirements that these people have never resisted? [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 1:18 pm by Trent
Rather than focus on the case, which was Lockheed Martin v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:59 am by Eugene Volokh
Therefore, people of common intelligence may be forced to guess at the provision’s meaning and may differ as to its applicability. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:30 am
The people who say, “Oh, it’s not really worth it, there’s no point doing it,” are often the ones who are quite happy to benefit from change when it comes later, but the people who have made the change are the ones who are determined to live in truth. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 3:05 am by Walter Olson
” [Matt Welch] “Threats of violence discourage people from participating in civic life. [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 8:23 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
The Peoples Republic of Bangladesh, with introductory note by Julia-Didon CayreNAFTA/UNCITRAL: Glamis Gold, Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 3:00 am by SOG Staff
Fortune reports that Justice Kagan, the Supreme Court’s young techno-savvy Justice, is hip to the jive of link shortening and used a Google-shortened link in her dissent in Utah v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 3:00 am by SOG Staff
Fortune reports that Justice Kagan, the Supreme Court’s young techno-savvy Justice, is hip to the jive of link shortening and used a Google-shortened link in her dissent in Utah v. [read post]