Search for: "People v. Modell" Results 2281 - 2300 of 4,409
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2015, 8:17 am by Rebecca Tushnet
   If we understand the causes of IP litigation: standard models say that if the size of the stakes increase relative to litigation cost, you get more bargaining failure. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 7:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Are there gender differences in how people understand the morality? [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:32 am by Venkat Balasubramani
We really ought to take a step back and question why we need to force people into these buckets (and examine the transaction costs required to create and enforce the taxonomization). [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
  Let us take, for example, the leading case of Naomi Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22, [2004] 2 AC 457, concerning a well known model with a drug problem. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 11:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Grief trolls—sending a person messages from deceased loved ones would be IIED; copyright can handle performances, collective bargaining can handle digital models in Hollywood. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, Fancourt J heard two applications in Duke of Sussex v NGN. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 2:01 pm
If you look at the existing comments, you see a string on specialized v. general wikis. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:47 am by Tian Lu
The 12th case in the collection, Xiang Jiahong v Dreamer Film Ltd. et al., was selected specifically to show the boundary of fair use regarding calligraphy works.The plaintiff, Xiang Jiahong (Mr Xiang), is a well-known calligrapher. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 4:36 am by Ben
 He is being held in a high security prison in Västervik, although he recently requested a transfer to a lower safety class unit. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 10:02 pm by Florian Mueller
So Google allows alternative payment methods only for the kinds of apps that account for less than a quarter of Google Play revenues.On iOS, the split is different: $32.8 billion for non-games (39%) v. $52.3 billion for games (61%).Google argues that its terms ensure its continued ability "to keep people safe on [Google's] platforms and invest in Android and Play for the benefit of the entire ecosystem. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 10:14 pm
  The number of people who have the horsepower and reputation to truly deserve a Supreme Court appointment is pretty small. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 8:41 am by Eric Goldman
Where, as here, a company’s public-facing statements are legitimately confusing, it is not the public’s fault for being confused. * Boston Globe: Boston Globe launches ‘Fresh Start’ initiative: People can apply to have past coverage about them reviewed * Owens v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
W/r/t meaningful opposition—just a filing of an opposition shouldn’t immediately kick people back into the regular process. [read post]