Search for: "Person v. Person"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 123,278
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2024, 1:11 pm
The Court of Appeal in Finnigan v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police (2013) EWCA Civ 1191, (2014) 1 WLR 445 (CA) made clear, in relation to the First Requirement, that the duty to make reasonable adjustments is anticipatory and is determined by reference to the needs of disabled persons as a class and not by reference to an individual in a specific case. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 12:46 pm
In James Meyers v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 10:55 am
" They draw on their significant body of work on the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) and the Marrakesh Treaty to analyse the recent South African constitutional case, Blind SA v Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 7:22 am
Corp v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
This is because we regard some persons or institutions as epistemic authorities. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 12:25 pm
Tax Consequences – The family court should consider each spouse’s disposable income, which is the amount of personal income an individual has after taxes and government fees, which can be spent on necessities, non-essentials, savings, etc. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 12:25 pm
Tax Consequences – The family court should consider each spouse’s disposable income, which is the amount of personal income an individual has after taxes and government fees, which can be spent on necessities, non-essentials, savings, etc. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 12:02 pm
” Perkins v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 9:56 am
Leroy v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 4:05 pm
Putnam and Vincent v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm
The amendments clarify the class of persons eligible to seek custody or access orders, but they do not grant special standing to grandparents. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 3:03 pm
In People v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 11:20 am
Background of Galarza v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 9:55 am
Today’s advance release business law opinion: Lyons v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 8:09 am
Jesse Davis v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 7:58 am
The second decision of note is Bhuthal v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:58 am
Luenenborg v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:11 am
That the petitioner has the ability and motivation to drive safely and within the law. v. [read post]
