Search for: "Price v. United States" Results 2281 - 2300 of 5,300
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2014, 6:58 pm by Lyle Denniston
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit — have interpreted the Supreme Court’s ruling last Term in United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:03 am
United Staffing Alliance, another ERISA case involving a claimed right to medical benefits. ** 06-1505, Meacham v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
The State courts and legislatures The first is the decision of the United States Supreme Court in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
12 Nov 2024, 12:25 pm by Unknown
About a year and a half ago, in Supreme Court Puts An End to a Bad Tax Practice, I explained that the United States Supreme Court handed down a decision, Tyler v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 2:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiffs received a promissory note stating that the $100,000 would be applied to the purchase price upon closing. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 10:53 am by Tara Hofbauer
In Syria, the Islamic State appears to be taking a beating from the Kurdish People’s Protection Unit (YPG). [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 12:41 pm by Robert Guite and Abby Meyer
  Thus a $.25 price premium applied to 1 million in unit sales amounts to $250,000 in damages. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:44 am by Sam Wieczorek
The stakes are high for this case:  there are at least 90,000 PSRs working in the United States for the various pharmaceutical manufacturers. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 1:34 am by INFORRM
IPSO 01232-24 Worgan v Wales on Sunday, 1 Accuracy, 2 Privacy, 6 Children, No breach – after investigation 01552-24 Energy & Climate Intelligence Unit v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy, Breach – sanction: publication of correction 22450-23 Daniel v Daily Record, 1 Accuracy, No breach – after investigation 01561-24 Kelly v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy, 12 Discrimination, 3 Harassment, No breach – after investigation 01690-24 Weir… [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 2:42 pm by Jeremy
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) gave its ruling this morning in Case C‑572/13, Hewlett-Packard Belgium SPRL v Reprobel SCRL, intervener Epson Europe BV, a request for a preliminary ruling under from the Cour d’appel de Bruxelles (Court of Appeal, Brussels, Belgium). [read post]