Search for: "ROUNDS v. STATE" Results 2281 - 2300 of 7,623
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2014, 4:39 am by Amy Howe
” At Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Ruthann Robson notes that judges in several lower courts have relied on Justice Scalia’s dissent in United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 8:01 am by Andrew Breidenbach
On Friday, the Senate approved a bill – crafted in response to the Court’s decision last Term in United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am by Amanda Rice
United States, predicting that the Court’s “ruling is likely to be quite narrow. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am by Amanda Rice
United States, predicting that the Court’s “ruling is likely to be quite narrow. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm by Marty Lederman
 (When it later moved the INS from the Department of Justice to DHS, Congress transferred this and other authorities from the Attorney General to the DHS Secretary.)When the Texas v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 11:08 am by Julia E. Browning and Stephen Marietta
United States Supreme Court Closes 2023 Term appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 11:08 am by Julia E. Browning and Stephen Marietta
United States Supreme Court Closes 2023 Term appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 3:30 am by David Markus
After seventeen years of repeated and often frivolous attempts tooverturn his convictions, Patterson is being given another go-round based on anorder issued in 2009 that both the State of Florida and the guardian ad litemthought was meaningless. [read post]
22 May 2015, 5:22 am by Amy Howe
At his eponymous blog, David Boyle discusses the oral arguments in the challenges to four states’ bans on same-sex marriage and the recognition thereof. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 7:31 am by Conor McEvily
” Writing for the online journal Defining Ideas, Richard Epstein critiques the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 7:54 am by Anna Christensen
  The blogosphere reported yesterday that Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont, has condemned the ruling as the Court’s most partisan since 2000’s Bush v. [read post]