Search for: "SCOTT v. UNITED STATES" Results 2281 - 2300 of 3,055
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2011, 6:37 pm by Daniel Low
The Parties agree that the United States District Court for Minnesota shall retain jurisdiction over the Action to enforce this Agreement. [read post]
29 May 2011, 10:26 am by Jeff Gamso
This section does not confer upon any person a right to appeal or modify any decision in a criminal proceeding, does not abridge any other right guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States or this constitution, and does not create any cause of action for compensation or damages against the state, any political subdivision of the state, any officer, employee, or agent of the state or of any political subdivision, or any officer of the court. [read post]
24 May 2011, 6:33 pm by Chip Merlin
On May 11, 2011, SB 408 was presented to Governor Scott, who signed the legislation into law on May 17, 2011 (Chapter Law 2011-39). [read post]
22 May 2011, 9:29 am by Jim Walker
Carnival Corporation, United States District Court Southern District of Florida, Case No. 10-21627-CIV-UNGARO. [read post]
21 May 2011, 10:45 pm
See also United States v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 8:36 am by David Oscar Markus
United States has all kinds of great rhetoric. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:05 pm by Brian Cuban
  The majority of the “Rakofksy 74” defendants are scattered across the United States and Canada. [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:40 am by PJ Blount
The Ninth Circuit’s Decision in Addington v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 6:11 pm by AALRR
" Notably, the Court of Appeal distinguished a troublesome decision of the United States District Court for the Central District of California in Wang v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 7:16 am by Kiera Flynn
  According to Justice Stevens, the president acted “not merely to do justice and avenge Sept. 11,” but instead “to remove an enemy who had been trying every day to attack the United States. [read post]
11 May 2011, 6:28 am
As he well knows, such terms have very precise meaning under US law, and by that metric - one that's extremely favorable for American companies, by the way - only a small minority of Chinese imports into the United States are "unfairly traded. [read post]
7 May 2011, 4:55 am
These funds had been earmarked as forfeiture proceeds for the victims in the Scott Rothstein Ponzi scheme in Florida (United States v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:15 pm by Dan Markel
”[v] Moreover, and “absent acceptable resolution, disputes would fester … [and] likely threaten the very survival of the community. [read post]
3 May 2011, 3:12 pm by randal shaheen
But this kind of intent ordinarily is shown by facts in the current case, not based on prior lawsuits and settlements (although dicta in the Fourth Circuit’s Scotts v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 3:46 am by Jon Hyman
– from Employment Law Worldview Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) Class Action Defense Cases–AT&T Mobility v. [read post]