Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S." Results 2281 - 2300 of 6,068
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
It will look back to several important recent Supreme Court decisions, in particular Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 9:19 am by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
The Massachusetts Land Court recently decided an interesting legal issue regarding the impact of a judgment execution on joint tenancy ownership in McHugh v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
BMG said Cox's network continued to be used by its customers for massive copyright infringement, undermining BMG's music sales. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 9:10 am by Brian Cordery
Sandoz focussed on “proportionality” and in particular the importance of the Court including consideration of “whether the injunction was proportionate and a legitimate barrier to trade”, citing Napp v Dr Reddy’s [2016] EWHC 1517 (Pat) and C-494/15 Tommy Hilfiger. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 1:48 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
"Assigned to this significant forfeiture case is Chief Judge Thomas Hogan, which is captioned of United States of America v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 10:01 am by Kevin Ackhurst
At the time of its implementation (2015), the threshold was intended to be C$600 million for two years, followed by two years at C$800 million, and then C$1 billion for a year, after which it would be adjusted annually for inflation. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 7:51 am by Dwayne Sam and Megan Brown
Entertainment Merchants, which invalidated a ban on the sale or rental of violent video games to minors. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 6:04 am
 This comes from  Best Buy Co Inc v Worldwide Sales Corporation Espana [2010] Bus LR 1761 at para 15; on appeal at [2011] FSR 742 at para 24.Was the German letter a groundless threat? [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 9:54 am by Dr. Shezad Malik
The allegedly defected hernia mesh devices include the Atrium C-Qur mesh, C-Qur TacShield and C-Qur V-Patch. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 11:29 am
  Apparently it can, based on Judge Robinson's Opinion last month in DDM&S Holdings, LLLC v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 4:59 am
 BackgroundThis reference [Stichting Brein v Jack Frederik Wullems, acting under the name of Filmspeler, C-527/15] had arisen in the context of litigation between Dutch anti-piracy organisation Stichting Brein and Jack Frederik Wullems over the sale, by the latter and through - among other things - his site www.filmspeler.nl, of various models of a multimedia player under the name ‘filmspeler’. [read post]