Search for: "State v. Back" Results 2281 - 2300 of 42,175
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2014, 9:17 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky and Mark J. Levin
  As support for its position, AFSA cites to Justice Breyer’s observation in Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 8:14 am by Kent Scheidegger
  The state courts failed to correctly apply the "prejudice" prong of Strickland v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 3:07 pm
Guess how much it (currently) costs to be admitted to practice before the United States District Court for the Northern District of California? [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 9:51 am by George Croner
Indeed, the “back door” search issue and the other challenges raised by Section 702’s opponents are not new. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm by Covington & Burling LLP
” The bill’s legislative findings state that “the West Virginia Legislature finds that the problem of phone companies permitting telemarketing phone calls with no ability to call back the company has been increasing” and that “[p]hone companies in this state should allow an individual to call telemarking companies back at the number where the call originated and speak to that telemarketing campaign’s representative. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 8:51 am by Jeff Gittins
The Utah Supreme Court recently issued its decision in the case of Washington Townhomes LLC v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 4:01 am by Dominic Pugh
In order to ascertain whether the works constituted “works of repair”, it was necessary to compare the property in its actual state with its previous state (Quick v Taff Ely Borough Council [1985] EWCA Civ 1). [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 7:11 am by Eric Goldman
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
However, this is not sufficient to prevent future investor-state arbitration challenges – as it will not affect the huge amount of BITs already in force between UPCA Members and third states. [read post]