Search for: "State v. Battle"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 7,542
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2020, 2:35 pm
Valeska V. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 5:56 am
App. 245 (2015) and Palomer v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
The States that have sought to intervene in Ukraine v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 1:45 pm
NSA, and Jewel v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 3:44 pm
Today was another example of a hard-fought battle which was finally won. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:43 am
The justices also sent United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 3:33 am
The focus is on the Supreme Court's recent decision in LULAC v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 10:39 am
On August 13, 2018, in McClellan v. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 7:30 am
This case is part of a larger legal battle being fought across the US for abortion rights following Dobbs. [read post]
4 May 2009, 5:00 am
The second case is Stack v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 6:15 pm
They noted that the Supreme Court has also ruled, in United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 4:26 am
The first is Weyerhaeuser Company v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 4:05 am
Service Employees International Union, Local 1000 involves the rights of state employees in states that permit state employee unions to charge an agency or service fee to non-union members. [read post]
27 May 2008, 3:43 am
Apparently AutoDesk is not pleased with this state of affairs and has been engaged in a running battle with Mr. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 4:43 am
” But, he continues, “it was by no means the final legal battle over educational choice in the United States. [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:13 pm
| Mr Justice Carr grants TQ Delta injunction after finding ZyXEL "holding out" in latest SEP battle | AIPPI UK Event Report: AI Generated Innovation | No interim injunction for copyright infringement => not a Happy Camper | DSM Directive Series #1: Do Member States have to transpose the [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:32 am
Given the differing traditions from which its judges are drawn, and bearing in mind that the court has not regarded the award of just satisfaction as its principal concern, it is not altogether surprising that it has generally dealt with the subject relatively briefly, and has offered little explanation of its reasons for awarding particular amounts or for declining to make an award”, per Lord Reed, Regina (Faulkner) v Secretary of State for Justice [2013] 2 AC 254 [34]. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 8:37 pm
” Amestoy was the author of Baker v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:29 am
State v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 9:22 am
Reeves appealed to the 11th Circuit, which had held in Walker v. [read post]
