Search for: "State v. Character"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 7,503
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2018, 2:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 10:40 am
Increasingly, however, the state is struggling. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 1:17 am
In the case of August Storck KG v OHIM, the CJEU saw that a mark can be registered under Article 7(3) (which has to be read in conjunction with Article 52 above) "…only if evidence is provided that it has acquired, in consequence of the use which has been made of it, distinctive character in the part of the [EU] in which it did not, ab initio, have such character". [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 1:17 am
In the case of August Storck KG v OHIM, the CJEU saw that a mark can be registered under Article 7(3) (which has to be read in conjunction with Article 52 above) "…only if evidence is provided that it has acquired, in consequence of the use which has been made of it, distinctive character in the part of the [EU] in which it did not, ab initio, have such character". [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 9:28 am
Each nominee, however, must be judged on the totality of their views, character, and opinions. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 9:13 pm
One example is Swimways Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 6:28 pm
The Court in Nanaimo (City) v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 3:04 am
Jacobs v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 6:56 am
Restraint of a substantial character. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
The method which they pursue, the character of the books and sources which they use, and the attitude of mind with which the approach them, all have their influence upon the shaping of the law, and upon their conception of the law itself. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
In Ortiz v United States, 585 U. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 6:56 am
State v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 10:12 am
Weirton Medical Center, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
” Feist Publ’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 7:30 am
Kavanaugh has not ruled directly on the validity of Roe v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 6:28 am
Specifically, s 117A(2) stated that regard must be had to the statement in s 117C(6) that, in the absence of very compelling circumstances, the public interest “required” deportation. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
Davis v. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 3:05 am
This provision states that person domiciled in a Member State may also be sued "where he is one of a number of defendants, in the courts for the place where any one of them is domiciled, provided the claims are so closely connected that it is expedient to hear and determine them together to avoid the risk of irreconcilable judgments resulting from separate proceedings".The substantial assessmentWith regard to the merits of the case, the Court focused on the notions of… [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 7:00 am
United States (argued and briefed as Dalmazzi v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 3:01 am
In Byrd v. [read post]
