Search for: "State v. English"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 6,457
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
Edward Tracy v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 12:42 pm
Abbott v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 1:07 pm
The Baker v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 5:52 pm
S.) 253; State v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:20 pm
The state is under various obligations under Article 2. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 5:31 pm
The group filed an amicus brief in Boumediene v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:23 am
” It also stated that “[t]his concern has been voiced loud and clear during the course of the 1994-95 school year by parents and students. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 1:10 pm
Flores (docket) -United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit- Whether a district court followed the proper procedure in issuing, and reconsidering, a class action lawsuit against a school district for giving insufficient funding to programs designed to each english to non-native speakers. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 3:10 pm
Furthermore, the court held that Australian Leather’s reliance on the doctrine of foreign equivalents was misplaced, stating that the doctrine is generally used to analyze non-English terms used in the American marketplace, rather than English-to-English comparisons. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 2:54 pm
Footnote: See Pabon v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 12:12 pm
Boris Kasolowsky/Magdalene Steup: “Dallah v Pakistan – Umfang und Grenzen der Kompetenz-Kompetenz von Schiedsgerichten” – the English abstract reads as follows: The UK Supreme Court and the Paris Cour d’appel have recently confirmed, in connection with the ICC arbitration involving Dallah and Pakistan, that the national state courts are not bound by any determinations made by an arbitration tribunal with regard to the existence of a valid… [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 9:19 am
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12–14 January 2016. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 9:11 am
Pompilio posted the Supreme Court’s decision in Egbert v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 12:00 pm
A juror must: Be a citizen of the United States, and a resident of the county, Be not less than eighteen years of age, Not have been convicted of a felony, and Be able to understand and communicate in the English language. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 5:45 am
In the years since Marshall’s 1833 ruling in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 10:36 pm
There simply is no way to reconcile FCC v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:44 am
The test for determining such an issue was recently authoritatively stated by the Supreme Court in the case of McInnes v HM Advocate 2010 SLT 266. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 7:17 am
He wanted a separate Nation of Islam service entirely in English. [read post]
