Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 2281 - 2300 of 9,084
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2020, 8:41 am by Thomas Key
First of all, the court ruled that non-binding explanatory materials prepared by judges in their judicial capacity as companion materials to their opinions are not subject to copyright protection. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 5:58 am by Jacquelyn Greene
While this order expires on May 1, 2020, it explicitly states that the Chief Justice fully expects to extend the directives for an additional 30 days and that judicial officials should expect the directives in the order to last throughout May 2020. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 2:08 am by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
The district court had reached the opposite conclusion at the motion to dismiss stage, finding the claims ineligible under the “abstract idea” category of judicial exceptions. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:47 am by Peter Mahler
The District Court in Ray summarized the parties’ opposing Burford arguments thusly: Mr. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 3:00 am by Joshua Holt
His high-profile cases include the “trial of the century,” otherwise known as United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 12:59 pm
Court for D.C., 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004) (first alteration in original). [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 5:33 am by Matthew Waxman, Samuel Weitzman
The district court ruled against the government on both statutory and constitutional grounds (effectively rebuking Biddle’s entire opinion). [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
The Supreme Court extended absolute immunity for § 1983 claims to state prosecutors in Imbler v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 7:06 pm by Jackie McDermott
The Court also asserted that by "changing the election rules so close to the election date,” the district court had violated the principle that “lower federal courts should ordinarily not alter the election rules on the eve of an election. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 7:42 am by Rachel Bercovitz
(For those who are interested, United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 8:47 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
This is an important question because if there was no constitutional violation, there was no basis for any federal court intervention in the first place, and the Supreme Court was correct to curtail the district court's order. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 11:49 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Accordingly, we affirm in part and reverse in part the district court's order, and remand this case for further proceedings. [read post]