Search for: "State v. Mark" Results 2281 - 2300 of 21,680
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2014, 3:14 am
The judgment in the Pinochet case and other national court decisions could mark the beginning of the development of new customary international law, but not mark its conclusion. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:45 am by Lindsey A. Zahn
” Alvi’s Drift Wine International v. von Stiehl Winery, Cancellation No. 92058100 (September 12, 2014) [not precedential]. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:40 am
In support of this opposition, eBay cites Perfumebay.com Inc. v. eBay Inc., 506 F3d 1165 (9th Cir., Nove. 5, 2007) where the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals stated that the term "BAY" was the dominant portion of the eBay mark. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 9:48 pm
 Mark Bennett wonders why then did the Texas Attorney General even bother to weigh in on the amicus brief.Good question.Here’s a portion from the intro:If the States choose to do so, the Constitution permits them to provide their citizens with protections above and beyond those embodied in the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 11:55 am by Nedim Malovic
Bad faith pursuant to Article 59(1)(b) of the EU Trade Mark Regulation (EUTMR), presupposes the presence of a dishonest state of mind or intention (Koton Mağazacilik Tekstil Sanayi ve Ticaret v EUIPO (C‑104/18 P)). [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 1:11 pm
Florida, which concerns the constitutionality of life without parole for juvenile criminals; United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 3:21 am
[Section 2(d) refusals to register the mark ECLIPSE for various goods relating to motion pictures and entertainment, in classes 9, 14, 18, 24, and 25, in view of, respectively, several class 9 registrations for the identical mark, a registration of the identical mark for watches in class 14, three registration in class 18 for ECLIPSE, ECLIPZE, and ECLIPS & Design, a class 24 registration of ECLIPSE for curtains, and a class 25 registration of the identical… [read post]