Search for: "State v. Peters" Results 2281 - 2300 of 5,036
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
UPC 252/2023 NanoString v Harvard ACT_551180/2023 (UPC_CFI_252/2023) The UPC’s Munich Central Division has recently issued its decision revoking Harvard’s EP 2794928 B1 (“the Patent”) in DE, NL, and FR, with other EPO member states likely excluded from the decision on commercial grounds having lapsed during opposition proceedings in 2019. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
KG v Stokke A/S, Stokke Nederland BV, Peter Opsvik and Peter Opsvik A/S, a decision where the CJEU addressed the trade mark absolute grounds of “substantial value” and “shape which results from the nature of the goods themselves”. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:03 am
” The case, Solid 21 Inc. v Hublot of America, et al. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 9:20 am by Richard Zorza
Thank you to all who posted for a spectacularly worthwhile and open conversation about Turner v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:45 am by Barbara Moreno
Forsythe, Clarke D., Abuse of Discretion: The Inside Story of Roe v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 5:13 pm by Colin O'Keefe
McMahon on Barger Wolen’s Litigation Management and Attorney Fee Analysis Blog The Combs v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 10:35 pm
Barrett Prettyman, Shawn Francis Peters, Gathie Barnett Edmonds, Marie Barnett Snodgrass & Bennett Boskey, Recollections of West Virginia State Board of Education V. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 5:30 pm by Carley Roberts and Mike Le
Peter O’ Rourke, Acting Secretary of Veteran Affairs.37 Kisor is not a tax case, but its implications for taxpayers could be significant. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Adam Dodek
The Alberta Court of Appeal’s review of the judgment of Judge Robin Camp in R v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
At Slate, David Gans argues that “[t]he sweeping arguments for a total religious exemption” in Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 3:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Any such award would be aimed at punishing the wrongdoer and deterring similar conduct by others (see Laurie Marie M. v Jeffrey T.M., 159 AD2d 52, 59 [2d Dept 1990], affd 77 NY2d 981 [1991]; Peters v Newman, 115 AD2d 816, 817 [3d Dept 1985], appeal dismissed 67 NY2d 916 [1986]; see also Le Mistral, Inc. v Columbia Broadcasting Sys., 61 AD2d 491, 494 [1st Dept 1978], appeal dismissed 46 NY2d 940 [1979] [citing 14 NY Jur, Damages, § 176 for proposition that… [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
First on the agenda is Abbott v. [read post]