Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 11,955
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2015, 7:50 am
The watches were sold by Costco for 35% less than Omega’s suggested retail price (p.19) and “price” is also a component of the marketing mix. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 12:58 pm
Schutte v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 10:32 am
” In National Broiler Marketing Association v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
PPL EnergyPlus, LLC 14-623Issue: (1) Whether, where, as a result of a state-directed procurement, the contract price to build and operate a power plant is the developer’s bid price, and may result in payments beyond what the developer earns selling the plant’s capacity in the auction supervised by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) the program is “field preempted” as a state’s attempt to set interstate wholesale rates;… [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
The policy in Minnehaha County has since been modified by the state legislature. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 12:48 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 12:48 pm
In United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 9:04 am
Last week, in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2021, 11:22 am
§ 41713(b)(1), a provision of the Airline Deregulation Act, preempted the plaintiff’s unjust enrichment and money had and received causes of action because both were state law claims “related to a price, route, or service of an air carrier. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:31 am
Galaria v. [read post]
2 May 2007, 4:58 am
In LIFE PARTNERS, INC. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 8:41 am
Similarly, Georgia v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 11:14 am
Crouch Railway Consulting, LLC v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 11:01 am
United States, 2012 U.S. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 10:09 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani with comments from Eric] Woods v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 9:54 pm
In Jannusch v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 7:57 am
Emigra Group, LLC v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:54 am
A shareholder class action alleging that the defendants falsely stated that a financial company maintained its principal executive offices in the United States in order to satisfy the criteria for inclusion in the Russell 2000 Index, a small cap stock market index, so as to allow the firm to maintain its listing on the Nasdaq moves on (Desta v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Lawton v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 4:39 am
He noted that a plain reading of the requirement was contrary to the company’s interpretation, and he rejected its argument that the First Circuit case of United States v. [read post]
