Search for: "State v. Smart"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 2,339
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2011, 9:17 am
By Eric Goldman Earlier this month, I attended an event at University of Colorado Boulder called “The Economics of Privacy,” sponsored by the Silicon Flatirons center. [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm
”[5] The Act does not provide a minimum period to receive comments on rule proposals.[6]But, a comment period of at least 60 days has been endorsed by the Administrative Conference of the United States for significant regulatory actions.[7] Further, executive orders issued by multiple past presidents from both political parties have all recognized the importance of a minimum 60-day comment period.[8] During the past four years, a significant number of proposals had comment periods… [read post]
7 May 2007, 9:40 pm
To aid in thinking about this question, consider Grutter v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 4:20 am
The State Supreme Court’s postponed all in-person hearings indefinitely until this pandemic ends. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 2:16 pm
Law profs and law deans are a smart bunch. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 10:26 pm
By Marc J. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 6:13 am
http://bit.ly/LLEIwp (Dean Gonsowski) Court Dismisses Countrywide Data Theft Suit - http://bit.ly/PC4fgK (Justine Gottshall) Crashing the Third Party: Experts Weigh How Far the Government Can Go in Reading Your Email -http://bit.ly/PHUzkO (Richard Brust) Days Five and Six of a Predictive Coding Narrative: Deep into the Weeds and a Computer Mind-meld Moment - http://bit.ly/NMrVLS (Ralph Losey) eDiscovery: 4 Tips for Managing the Document Review… [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
One of the fascinations of electronic communications is how they make many traditional questions of law new again. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 2:16 pm
Law profs and law deans are a smart bunch. [read post]
26 May 2009, 10:08 am
Most of them are relatively meaningless or unproductive, in the sense that they barely make factual claims at all, but just state -- really, restate -- vague and contestable value judgments. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:00 am
Still, you get the feeling that the laser focus never dims, that she even dreams smart. [read post]
9 May 2012, 6:17 am
California Court Declines to Follow Race Tires, Allows Taxation of eDiscovery Costs - bit.ly/IZoWhW (K&L Gates) Peck Wins By Submission; Parties Get Shot At Title Fight - bit.ly/Jfheio (eLessons Learned) Random Sample Calculations And My Prediction That 300,000 Lawyers Will Be Using Random Sampling By 2022 – bit.ly/IBIaZ5 (Ralph Losey) “Reasonableness” is Key When Assessing E-Discovery Efforts – bit.ly/IZp7d9 (Mike Hamilton) Reducing… [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
” (This may have been the first sign of Ruth’s future role as one of the most active and precise questioners on the United States Supreme Court Bench.) [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
Congress, and State Governors. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 8:43 am
Congress, and State Governors. [read post]
30 May 2012, 1:37 pm
Congress, and State Governors. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:09 am
Congress, and State Governors. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 8:40 am
Congress, and State Governors. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
Congress, and State Governors. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 7:51 am
Congress, and State Governors. [read post]
