Search for: "State v. Waite" Results 2281 - 2300 of 10,759
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2012, 12:20 pm by Don Cruse
Some of those claims made it to the Texas Supreme Court in Jefferson State Bank v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
  We’ll just have to wait to see if the judge’s words will be sufficient or simply a waste of time. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 7:25 pm
After getting a chance to actually read the majority and dissenting opinions in Cumo v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 3:52 pm
First, he waited until the eleventh hour to begin opposing a summary judgment motion he had known about for months. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 6:44 pm by Jeff Gamso
  But it's what the statute written in 1981 says, and it's absolutely what the Supreme Court of Ohio said in 1996 in a case called State v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am by Adam Wagner
Lumba (WL) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 12 (23 March 2011) – Read judgment / press summary The Supreme Court has ruled that it was unlawful and a “serious abuse of power” for the Home Office to follow an unpublished policy on the detention of foreign national prisoners which contradicted its published policy. [read post]
30 May 2012, 2:03 pm by Rumpole
Lots of intrigue in the hallways of the stately REGJB. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:07 pm by Lyle Denniston
EME Homer City Generation — right of states to avoid adopting plans to prevent downwind air pollution in neighboring states; also, question of federal court jurisdiction (cases consolidated for one hour of argument) No. 12-930 — Mayorkas v. de Osorio — right of foreign nationals to bring their children into the U.S., or to change their status, when the children have reached the age of twenty-one while waiting on government lists for available… [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 12:57 pm by Larry
My second quick update is to Rockwell Automation v. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 6:37 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This issue is interesting but the Court of Appeals does not address the merits, holding instead that this case is ripe for judicial review.The case is Tripathy v. [read post]