Search for: "The People v. Cross"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 5,464
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2009, 3:45 pm
The case, People v Hendrickson, stands for the evidentiary proposition that the testimony of the un-married participant in an adulterous union (the "other woman") can supply the requisite testimony to support a conviction, subject of course, to cross examination.In the here and now of 2009, Michigan's family courts have adhered to the "no-fault" provisions of the divorce statutes. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:01 pm
In Quill Corp. v. [read post]
21 May 2021, 9:02 am
Reference: People v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:01 pm
In Quill Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 11:51 am
We represent people who have been seriously injured in motor vehicle accidents caused by the negligence of another. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 12:05 pm
The court also held that DACA failed the first step in Chevron USA v Natural Res. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 5:48 pm
I’ve never looked at any of my finals because I usually just want to forget about the whole final experience until the following semester, but it’s crossed my mind on a few occassions that it could help me figure out where people are taking off points. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 7:35 am
In my job as a Syracuse and Central New York car accident attorney, I personally have noticed a big increase in the number of cross-over and rear-end collisions due to young people texting while driving within the last few years. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:16 am
In a 2-1 decision, the Michigan Court of Appeals recently ruled that a certificate mailed to a state driver, notifying him of his suspended license, is "testimonial" as that term is used in the constitution thus, the Secretary of State must produce it's clerk at a trial for driving on a suspended license.The case, People v Nunley, arose in a district court in Washtenaw County. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 8:16 am
[People v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:00 am
He testified this activity of hugging and kissing by the two young people went on 2 to 3 times a day, however, on cross-examination he restated and said the activity was frequent, but may not have been that often. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 6:16 pm
the Colorado Supreme Court handed Ward Churchill the latest in a series of losses, in Churchill v. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 6:58 am
Second, a larger jury allows for a broader cross-section of people and helps to render a more fair and balanced verdict. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
by Jessica Dorsey The ICJ is set to deliver its judgment in Belgium v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:29 am
Why this is working in this way is perfectly summed up in this decision out of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Curtis v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 5:15 pm
At the moment that the SU V was crossing the intersection, a large semi truck was traveling down the other road. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:06 pm
This move has broad cross-party support. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 10:00 am
”According to the New York State Court of Appeals, “escape” typically means to “get away, break away, get free or get clear, with conscious purpose to evade custody,” and since Antwine broke free of the realm of custody without authorization –- forcing police to give chase and placing an officer and the public at risk –- there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction in question.Clearly, there was no escaping that… [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 5:16 am
ColbIn Justice Alito's (SA's) leaked opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 4:09 pm
Cross-ideological discussion and disagreement is encouraged as well. [read post]
