Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 2281 - 2300 of 8,957
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2019, 12:46 pm by Jo Dale Carothers
  Specifically, after learning from several years of AIA trial proceedings, including IPRs, the PTAB created the POP, which serves two main purposes:  1) to rehear certain matters and 2) to assist the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) in determining whether a PTAB decision should be designated as a “precedential” or “informative” decision rather than a “routine” decision. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 11:24 am by Joel R. Brandes
As Petitioner stated in her verified petition, “Petitioner never acquiesced or consented to the relocation of Z.F.M.Z. in the United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 6:57 am by Elizabeth Lowman
United States, the court must decide at which point the intent to commit a crime requirement must be present in a burglary case. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Under this agreement, the United States was obligated to terminate all legal proceedings in U.S. courts involving claims of United States nationals against Iran, to nullify all attachments and judgments obtained therein, and to bring about the termination of such claims through binding arbitration in an Iran-United States Claims Tribunal. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 2:23 pm by John Elwood
United StatesUnited States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 8:41 am by Evan Lee
Petitioner Hamid Mohamed Ahmed Ali Rehaif entered the United States on an F-1 student visa to study at the Florida Institute of Technology in August 2013. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 5:56 am by Lindsay Offutt
 Justice Elena Kagan explained the problem with the Secretary’s decision after pointing out that the Census Bureau advised the Secretary not use both a citizenship question on the census and the administrative record to determine an estimated number of non-citizens currently living in the United States. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 11:13 pm by JP Sarmiento
Finally, the petitioner seeking the waiver needs to demonstrate that, on balance, it would be beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer and labor certification requirements. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 12:30 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The company filed a petition to the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am by Joel R. Brandes
The ICWA and the federal regulations explicitly state that Awhere applicable State or other Federal law provides a higher standard of protection to the rights of the parent or Indian custodian than the protection accorded under the Act, ICWA requires the State or Federal court to apply the higher State or Federal standard@ (25 CFR 23.106; see 25 USC ' 1921). [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
The unvamished truth is that these diagnoses represent the most significant spike in incidences of measles in the United States in many years and that the Williamsburg section of Brooklyn is at its epicenter....The religious objection exemption contained in Public Health Law $2 164(a) applies only to the certificate of immunization required to admit a child to school, not to remedies attendant upon declaration of a public health emergency....Petitioner raise the issue of… [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm by John Elwood
If a lawfully admitted permanent resident is removable from the United States, he may seek cancellation of removal if, among other things, he has “resided in the United States continuously for 7 years after having been admitted in any status. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 8:11 am by Howard M. Wasserman
Arguments of amicus curiae United States Principal Deputy Solicitor General Jeffrey Wall argued for the United States as amicus curiae urging reversal. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 3:55 am by Hui Zhang
Unlike the United States, an invalidation action before the PRB usually would not stay the infringement proceeding for invention patent. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
” Leah Litman has this blog’s analysis of yesterday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:01 pm by Andrew Siegel
Prior decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit and scattered language in Supreme Court opinions and in the statute’s legislative history have suggested that—this seemingly broad language notwithstanding—state law only becomes relevant when federal law creates a substantive or remedial gap that needs to be filled. [read post]