Search for: "U.S. District Court for Northern District of California" Results 2281 - 2300 of 3,656
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2013, 9:00 am by LTA-Editor
District Court for the District of Northern California, the case seems likely to go to trial. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 11:36 am by Florian Mueller
While Judge Koh in the Northern District of California applied the "causal nexus" standard in just the same way to a preliminary (pre-trial) and permanent (post-trial) injunction analysis, the Federal Circuit could still set a different standard in connection with permanent injunctions.At this stage it appears extremely difficult for patent holders like Apple to win meaningful remedies in U.S. federal court. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 1:27 pm by admin
In November of 2012, four military service women filled a law suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, in San Francisco. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 7:21 pm by Florian Mueller
Samsung lawsuits in the Northern District of California, entered four more of her long-awaited post-trial orders. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 9:45 pm by Florian Mueller
Yesterday the Federal Circuit consolidated the two appeals into a single cross-appeal, and a few hours later Google's Motorola brought this motion.Venue fights occur all the time, though they are much more common in district court (East Texas or Northern California? [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:52 pm
The patent war, which began in April of 2011, when Apple filed a lawsuit against Samsung in the District Court for the Northern District of California, has most recently been hit by a decision of the U.S. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 2:05 am by Dan Flynn
District Court for the Eastern District of California based in Sacramento. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 10:38 pm by Florian Mueller
Samsung lawsuits pending in the Northern District of California, issued a ruling on Wednesday evening denying, for the time being, a request by Samsung to conduct certain discovery of Apple in California in order to use the produced material and obtained information against certain patent infringement claims brought by Apple in Japan. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 10:32 pm by Florian Mueller
At the trial of that matter in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Samsung asserted all companies implementing a standard in its products must seek out and accept a license on FRAND terms. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 4:30 am by Guest Blogger
Rounds, 686 F.3d 889 (8th Cir. en banc 2012).The confusion caused by this unexpected constitutionalization of the doctor-patient relationship is exemplified by two recent cases in the Northern District of California: Welch v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:14 pm by Florian Mueller
Late on Tuesday, Apple and Samsung filed a joint stipulation with the United States District Court for the Northern District of California concerning the addition of new products, or new product versions, to the second case pending between these parties in that district. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 12:45 pm
In a patent case pending before Judge Koh in the Northern District of California, Defendant Pinnaclife Inc. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 10:56 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
We will keep our readers updated with further developments as they break from the Northern District of California. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:06 pm by Jessica Mendelson
Chemical Company Trade Secrets to China – In March 2012, a former chemical company employee pled guilty in the Northern District of California to “conspiracy to commit economic espionage, admitting that he provided trade secret” to companies controlled by the Chinese government. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:09 pm
John’s Anglican Church in Petaluma, CA ; Episcopal Diocese of Northern California v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 11:44 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed plaintiffs’ Section 11 claim with prejudice, holding that their “naked allegations” that the shares they purchased were issued in the secondary offering were not sufficient to give them standing to assert a Section 11 claim. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 11:08 am
” The United States District Court for the Northern District of California agreed, holding that plaintiffs’ allegations failed to give rise to a strong inference of scienter. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 3:02 am by Andrew Trask
 In the Northern District of California, Judge William Alsup keeps a standing order informing attorneys of how he will evaluate any proposed class action settlements. [read post]