Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 2281 - 2300 of 9,477
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2009, 12:00 am
A designated smoking area:(i) must be located at least twenty (20) feet from any operable window or door used by the public of an indoor area of a multi-unit residence where smoking is prohibited;(ii) must not include, and must be at least twenty (20) feet from, outdoor areas primarily used by children including, but not limited to, areas improved or designated for play or swimming;(iii) must be no more than twenty-five (25) percent of the total outdoor area of the premises for which… [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
  To construe “these four puzzling opinions that have few common aspects,” Tyree employed the analysis for such situations adopted by the United States Supreme Court in Marks v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:18 am by Amy Howe
There is still more coverage of and commentary on United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am by Eric Goldman
Importantly, the Court’s discussion of the source-identifying function of trademarks, repeated emphasis on source confusion as the principal harm in trademark law (see, e.g., the type of confusion “most commonly in trademark law’s sights”, “the bête noire of trademark law”, and the “cardinal sin under the law”), and discussion of the United We Stand America opinion suggests the Justices may like Rogers’ focus on preventing uses… [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
First up is State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Hydrick, 500 F.3d at 1001; see also United States v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:54 am by Suzanne Ito
Khaled El-Masri's illegal rendition, detention and torture will continue to haunt the United States until the right thing is done and justice is served at home, not just abroad. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 pm by Jennifer Simon, Esq.
First, the FAA and Cape Wind Associates could appeal the decision by submitting a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 7:42 pm by chucknewton
"Any effort, action, or demand by a creditor to collect a pre-petition debt violates the automatic stay".Regardless of the stay violation, Paul Hill contended that he could not be sanctioned for his action of posting the sign because of his entitlement to exercise his free speech right under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, citing Turner Advertising Co. v. [read post]