Search for: "United States v. State of Louisiana" Results 2281 - 2300 of 2,557
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
It was a huge setback for efforts to dismantle the ongoing privilege of whiteness in the United States and is symptomatic of resistance among movement conservatives on and off the Court to efforts to build a more inclusive society.In both respects, Students for Fair Admissions is a deeply undemocratic decision. [read post]
26 May 2010, 2:05 pm by Joe Koncelik
The legislative activity stems from the Supreme Court ruling in Massachusetts v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:04 pm by Series of Essays
Ehrman, Southern Methodist University School of Law, and Robin Kundis Craig, USC Gould School of Law EPA’s regulatory authority is limited by the Supreme Court’s interpretation of “waters of the United States. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:19 am by Adam Chandler
Finally, Wendy Kaminer has a piece for the Atlantic on the federal sex offender case, United States v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am by John Elwood
Louisiana, 14-280, so that doesn’t really explain the relist. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:05 am by Ronald Collins
United States (2000), Rehnquist declined to expressly overrule Miranda v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:58 am by Eugene Volokh
Indeed, the State of Louisiana passed a highly similar bill to H.B. 1181 shortly before a vendor for its Office of Motor Vehicles was breached by a cyberattack. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
This term, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in Jones v. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 5:19 am by Phil Dixon
The story notes that this is the 30th mass killing in the United States in 2024. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am by Andrew Hamm
” Heather Long for the Washington Post reports that Collins “said Sunday she would not vote for any judge who wanted to end access to abortion in the United States by overturning Roe v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:08 am by Brian A. Comer
Risperdal is different from other antipsychotic medicines and “doctors needed to know that,” he added.Jurors will begin deliberating the case tomorrow.The case is State of South Carolina v. [read post]