Search for: "Waits v. State" Results 2281 - 2300 of 10,689
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2015, 9:40 am by Larry
That is the background to United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 7:45 am
Disclaimer: not one of the uniformsat the centre of the caseThe US copyright decision everybody was waiting for is finally out.In Star Athletica v Varsity Brands the US Supreme Court has just ruled that cheerleading uniforms are eligible for copyright protection ['copyrightable', to use the US copyright jargon].The lawThe US Copyright Act, §101 states that “pictorial, graphic, or sculptural features” of the “design of a useful… [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 9:22 am by Howard Friedman
In New Jersey, a superseding criminal complaint (full text) was issued yesterday in United States v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 6:30 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
Because parties have contracted in advance for a certain type of restriction, it makes little sense for a company to have to wait for actual misappropriation of company secrets to enforce the agreement in court. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 6:37 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This issue is interesting but the Court of Appeals does not address the merits, holding instead that this case is ripe for judicial review.The case is Tripathy v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 12:57 pm by Larry
My second quick update is to Rockwell Automation v. [read post]
21 Sep 2013, 5:30 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
In this circumstance, a plaintiff - faced with imminent disclosure - probably doesn't need to wait until actual breach and can instead sue on the contract. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 8:59 am by David M. McLain
  We will continue to watch the goings on at the State Capitol and will report any changes to roll back past changes to Colorado law. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 12:56 pm by admin
Sheila, trying to collect herself, wiped her tears away and turned to the woman and three other patients in the waiting room. [read post]
19 May 2015, 12:01 pm by CJLF Staff
  Denny Walsh of the Sacramento Bee reports on the high court's decision in People v. [read post]