Search for: "Washington v. People"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 6,337
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
When last I wrote on this website about the plan, around two years ago, elected legislatures in eight states (Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Washington, Vermont and California) and the District of Columbia—comprising 132 electoral college votes altogether (almost half the needed 270 votes)—had adopted the idea. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 9:00 pm
My Lexis search of "'green tongue' and marijuana" returned the following four results in the state and federal courts, which I will be reviewing: 1.PEOPLE v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 7:30 am
Wirt represented the Cherokee in the 1831 U.S. court case, Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:32 pm
Compare attractiveness of Simon Tam’s claim v. that of the Washington football team. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 1:49 pm
Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Washington v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 1:49 pm
Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Washington v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:42 am
* People v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 1:07 pm
This case was about giving people a role in the creation of the laws that govern their lives." [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 3:00 am
Chief Justice John Roberts cited Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:32 am
The editorial board of The Washington Times weighs in on Arab Bank v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
Trump v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 4:03 am
Constitution Daily’s We the People podcast features a discussion of Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 3:36 am
” In an op-ed at Newsweek, Alida Garcia warns that “[ICE] admits it is reopening previously closed removal cases of DACA recipients, [which] could allow [the agency] to start detaining and deporting people as quickly as possible if the Supreme Court gives it the green light” in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 3:39 am
Monday’s second case is Georgia v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 11:44 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 5:09 pm
The privacy v security fallacy. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 2:58 am
It is supposed to represent the people of the state. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 3:52 am
In the 2005 Gonzales v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:47 am
In its important 1968 decision in Flast v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:47 am
In its important 1968 decision in Flast v. [read post]
