Search for: "Washington v. Texas"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 2,769
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am
On January 15, the court issued its first 5-4 decision of the term, in Stokeling v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 7:44 pm
District Court for the Northern District of Texas’ 2015 ruling in Erica P. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
, (Daily Dose of IP), 26 August: WIPO symposium on IP and multilateral agreements – Geneva: (IPKat), 11-12 September: US LSI: 4th annual conference on ‘Current issues in complex IP licensing’ – Philadelphia: (Patent Docs), 11 September/15 October: PLI seminar on developments in pharmaceutical and biotech patent law – New York/San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 15-16 September: UniForum & SAIIPL domain name ADR workshop – Centurion (South… [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Washington, No. 07-1523, 07-1884, 07-2541 Federal district courts lack the inherent power to vacate a sentence procured by fraud, any such power having been abrogated by the enactment of 18 U.S.C. section 3582(c) and the amendments to FRCP 35. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
" U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, January 24, 2008 US v. de Jesus-Ojeda, No. 05-41265 "Defendants' sentences arising from an illegal alien smuggling scheme is affirmed where the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's findings and sentencing enhancements under U.S.S.G. section 2L1.1(b)(5) and (6) were properly applied as, based on the facts of the case, it was foreseeable by participants in the scheme conducted in South Texas in August that others… [read post]
5 Feb 2025, 10:26 pm
Trump (complaint) was consolidated with this case.Update-2: On Feb. 5, 2025, Judge Deborah Boardman issued an opinion granting the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary nationwide injunction blocking implementation of the birthright citizenship Executive Order.2025-02-05 Immigration and CitizenshipExecutive Action: Birthright Citizenship (Executive Order)State of Washington et al v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to adopt… [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 1:46 pm
The plaintiffs in Hughes et al v. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 8:17 am
In Gamble, the court also heard from the state of Texas which, according to a report from the Washington Post, “heads a group of 36 states objective to any change in the law. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 1:54 pm
Hixon v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:00 pm
” The most familiar example of this comes from the Supreme Court’s 1989 case, Texas v. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 1:15 am
"About the writer:Call Rob Hotakainen, McClatchy Washington Bureau, (202) 383-0009. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 10:33 am
Texas Solicitor General Jonathan F. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:11 pm
IP Brokers: No Ethical Regulations and No Standards In a blog post by Raymond Millien of the Washington D.C. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 8:17 am
In Gamble, the court also heard from the state of Texas which, according to a report from the Washington Post, “heads a group of 36 states objective to any change in the law. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 8:41 pm
In the 1987 case of South Dakota v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Texas, when the Supreme Court ruled the president had the authority to revoke the Migrant Protection Protocols. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 2:22 pm
The ones of which we are currently aware include: Connecticut (civil trials only); New Hampshire; New Mexico (civil trials only); Harris County, Texas; Dallas County, Texas (civil trials only); Cuyahoga County, Ohio; Cleveland Municipal Court, Ohio; US District Court, Western District of Washington; U.S. [read post]
