Search for: "A,B,C Insurance Companies" Results 2301 - 2320 of 2,924
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2024, 3:43 pm by Xandra Kramer
Firstly, Article 29(3)(b) CSDDD states that the costs of judicial proceedings seeking to establish the civil liability of companies under the Directive shall not be prohibitively expensive. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 7:33 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The New York Times on April 27, 2012 released the following: "By JAMES B. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 7:33 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The New York Times on April 27, 2012 released the following: "By JAMES B. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 2:55 pm by Jessica Perry
Under this test, a worker is an employee—rather than an independent contractor—unless the hiring entity can prove all of the following: (A) the worker is free from the control and direction of the hiring entity in connection with the performance of the work, both under the contract and in fact; (B) the worker performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business; and (C) the worker is customarily engaged in an independently established… [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 11:47 pm by John Watts & M. Stan Herring
" This means that if a company collects debts and obtains an account after it has been in default, then the company is not a creditor. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 7:39 am by Jane Bambauer
—The term “consumer report” means any written, oral, or other communication of any information by a consumer reporting agency bearing on a consumer’s credit worthiness, credit standing, credit capacity, character, general reputation, personal characteristics, or mode of living which is used or expected to be used or collected in whole or in part for the purpose of serving as a factor in establishing the consumer’s eligibility for— (A) credit or… [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 9:34 pm
Citing Anheuser-Busch, Inc., 351 NLRB No. 40 (2007), the judge reasoned that where employees are discharged for violating company work rules (here, the Respondent's drug and alcohol policies), the discharge is "for cause" under Section 10(c) of the Act, even if the employees' conduct is discovered by means of an unlawful unilateral change. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Or how about Insureco, 501(c)(15) Captive, PINSCO (Personal Insurance Company), Captive Tune-Up, 21% Solution, WITS, E Replacement (WITS for Homebuilders), and Employee Benefits Captive? [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 6:49 pm by admin
Criminal charges were laid against individuals and gas retail companies, including Irving, Shell, Olco and Esso, pursuant to §45(1)(c) of the Competition Act. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 9:52 pm by Simon Gibbs
So, solicitor and client are considering possible methods of funding and narrow the options down to: (a) Conditional fee agreement (b) Third Party Funding (c) Contingency fee agreement In each case the take will be 25% of damages. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:02 am by Law Lady
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 3rd District.Appeals -- Mediation -- Failure to appear -- Sanctions imposed on parties who failed to appear at court ordered appellate mediation where no motion seeking to excuse personal appearance was filed -- Appearance of parties' insurance company representative cannot take parties' placeCARDEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 11:08 am by Chris Laughton
It might follow that reg 8(7) of TUPE will apply to pre-pack administrations, with the effect that employees cease to transfer automatically in pre-pack sales, resulting in a higher burden on the National Insurance Fund. 3.4 Rule 5(1)(b) (opinion that the pre-pack represents best value for creditors) (and in subsequent rules where the same drafting is repeated): The drafting of "...will achieve a better result for the company's creditors as a whole than anything… [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 5:53 am by Jack Goldsmith
”   February 2015, Anthem (health insurance). [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 8:13 pm
Seven million lost their health insurance. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Dominion of Canada General Insurance Company v. [read post]