Search for: "BAKER V. STATE" Results 2301 - 2320 of 3,489
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2011, 5:31 am by JB
A hundred and twenty years later, the Warren Court flirted with the revival of the Guarantee Clause in the famous apportionment cases, Baker v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 4:43 am by Mandelman
  So, plotting data on a ‘V” shaped model but having it turn out to be a different letter of  the alphabet, is a like drawing the route New Jersey on a map of Australia. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:23 am by Dave
  Section 122, Housing Act 1996 enables an order to be made which makes different provision for different/ areas/classes of case/cases but there is no requirement for such differences, and no express requirement for HB to be set at a level that fully covers any claimant’s actual housing costs in any area.Grounds 2 and 3 were taken together as in sum they concern the (well-travelled) territory of “due regard” to the need to eliminate discrimination and promote equality on which… [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:23 am by Dave
  Section 122, Housing Act 1996 enables an order to be made which makes different provision for different/ areas/classes of case/cases but there is no requirement for such differences, and no express requirement for HB to be set at a level that fully covers any claimant’s actual housing costs in any area.Grounds 2 and 3 were taken together as in sum they concern the (well-travelled) territory of “due regard” to the need to eliminate discrimination and promote equality on which… [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 11:24 am by Mike "No Man" Navarre
Takara, Senior Airman (E-4), United States Air Force, Petitioners v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:00 pm by admin
On the other hand, freedom of speech and anonymity on the Internet are generally well-protected by our courts. 1995’s United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 4:11 am by Rosalind English
The ruling on Tony Bland is now nearly twenty years old (Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] AC 789) and there the patient was in a permanent vegetative state after being crushed at the 1989 Hillsborough stadium disaster. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:55 am
Regardless, the quote suggests itself as the inspiration behind the United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of California‘s charging decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 6:09 am
Mr Justice Baker found that "the importance of preserving life" was "the decisive factor" in the case. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:14 pm by KC Johnson
After ten days of investigation, State Prosecutor [sic: District Attorney] Michael Nifong became involved in the case. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 6:09 pm by Viking
STUCKY, Judge (concurring in the result): I affirm my dissenting vote in United States v. [read post]