Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 2301 - 2320
of 34,273
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
A recent California Court of Appeals case (People v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 12:43 pm
(Abeel v. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 6:34 am
The Court's Holding First, the California Appellate Court said that: "In Flanagan v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 12:43 am
The California Pregnancy Disability Leave LAW (PDLL) is part of California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 2:41 pm
The law applies to companies who do business in California, though the scope of that definition leads to inclusion of companies around the world (whether they know it or not). [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
Their domestic relations case began in January when Lyndie filed her petition for legal separation in the California family law court. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 4:50 am
Independent Contractors—Court of Appeal reversed trial court’s judgment that, as matter of law, dump truck driver (driver) who hit and seriously injured plaintiff on construction site while delivering asphalt purchased… Dominguez (Omar) v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 7:51 am
Bay View Bank (2001) 87 Cal.App.4th 452, 456 [noting bank’s obligations to depositor except when the Law applies]; Chazen v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:54 am
A federal district court in California has weighed in on the question of whether student-athletes are employees for the purposes of minimum wage and overtime laws. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 2:25 pm
California. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:19 pm
The issue decided by the California Supreme Court in Arias v. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 3:52 am
As the court put it:Although the numbers in this case are breathtaking, California law is well-established and quite clear. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 12:08 pm
The California Court of Appeal (Sixth District) issued this unpublished opinion affirming a trial court's decision not to award punitive damages after a bench trial.In affirming the trial court's decision, the Court of Appeal noted that, under California law, "even where the plaintiff prevails in a case where punitive damages are permissible, the plaintiff 'is never entitled to them. [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:02 am
That issue came before the California Supreme Court in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 2:58 am
See Guido v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 6:04 am
California Court Clarifies Position on Websites and the ADA In a recent case, Martinez v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in 2012 in Arizona v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 8:24 pm
Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit, arguing that the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act (“FAAAA”) does not preempt California’s meal and rest break law. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 3:36 am
., appeal after remand Million v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 8:11 am
In a case that has been followed closely by employers in the hospitality industry, on August 9, 2010 the California Supreme Court ruled in Lu v. [read post]
