Search for: "California v. Texas"
Results 2301 - 2320
of 4,429
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2015, 9:05 pm
In a new Cato podcast, I talk with Caleb Brown about the Court’s pending case on “disparate impact” liability in housing and finance, Texas Dept. of Housing vs. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 8:30 am
In Webb v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 8:59 am
Texas Eastern Overseas, Inc [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:50 am
What do employers need to know about the Supreme Court’s pregnancy accommodation decision last week in Young v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:57 am
Michigan v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:23 am
Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, the challenge to Texas’s specialty license-plate scheme. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 1:47 pm
Texas, Justice Stephen G. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 7:31 am
The dispute is reminiscent of Ellis v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 6:41 am
District Court for the Northern District of California 2002); Texas Guaranteed Student Loan Corp. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
Frank v. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 6:29 am
Although in the 1990s California was a trendsetter in tough immigration measures (with Proposition 187 a sterling example), it is not one of the 26 states that has sued the U.S. government in Texas v. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 3:20 am
Nevada, California, and New York led the nation in new job announcements last year, followed by Michigan, Arizona, Texas, Colorado, North Carolina, Utah, and New Mexico. 5 things to watch as Michigan Gov. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am
Texas, 14-292, the reigning relist king, scored its sixth relist on Monday. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm
Texas, 14-292, is back once more, involving: (1) “[w]hether the former Texas special issues for death penalty sentencing [provide] . . . an appropriate vehicle for the jury to consider and give full effect to mitigating evidence of good character [under Penry v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
Texas 14-292Issue: (1) Whether the former Texas special issues for death penalty sentencing do provide – as the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals held – or do not provide – as the Fifth Circuit has held – an appropriate vehicle for the jury to consider and give full effect to mitigating evidence of good character, such that failure to provide a separate question violates the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments under this Court’s jurisprudence in… [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 4:13 pm
Aghaian v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 9:00 am
Supreme Court in Daubert v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:26 am
Congress and state governments almost certainly will be forced to deal with these broader challenges regardless of the outcome of King v. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 2:22 pm
O’Shaughnessy v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
Texas, 14-292, involving a quadruple homicide from so long ago that people still thought I had promise. [read post]
