Search for: "Carrie Smith" Results 2301 - 2320 of 4,176
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2014, 8:07 am by Jeff Welty
That suggestion is significant, as many courts have viewed such data as having no constitutional protection as a result of the third-party doctrine of Smith v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 8:49 pm by tomwatts
Even though it still would be infeasible to physically carry in paper form the quantity of information on a flip phone, there are significantly less potential privacy concerns in Wurie than in Riley. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 8:49 pm by tomwatts
Indeed, the Court distinguished these cases from pen registers in Smith v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 11:27 am by Jeff Foust
Lamar Smith (R-TX), chairman of the committee, in his opening statement, referring to NASA’s Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM) plans. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 2:18 pm by Hanni Fakhoury
 She found the idea that people have no expectation of privacy in information they turn over to others was “ill suited to the digital age, in which people reveal a great deal of information about themselves to third parties in the course of carrying out mundane tasks. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:38 am
  As discussed above, they didn’t carry their burden. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 7:49 am by J. Bradley Smith, Esq.
The diapers are easily identified because they carry a label with the name of the organization. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
The Court noted that nearly every state acknowledges the survival of the privilege after the death of the client, with exceptions generally limited to disclosures necessary to carry out the intent of the client regarding settlement of his or her estate. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 12:41 pm by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Highway Patrol officials say that the truck was carrying hazardous materials and if it had jackknifed, it would have been much worse for all those involved. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Steve Vladeck
As for the FTCA “preemption” claim, the Third Circuit held that the plaintiffs’ state tort claims were not preempted because “[t]he military did not retain command authority over KBR’s installation and maintenance of the pump”—i.e., KBR was not carrying out specific instructions from the military when it committed the allegedly tortious act. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 11:05 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
  According to officers with the North Carolina Highway Patrol, the crash occurred when an ambulance operated by two EMTS was hit by an oncoming car carrying three people. [read post]