Search for: "Childs v. Childs"
Results 2301 - 2320
of 28,583
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2008, 6:46 pm
Punishing the crime of child rape with the death penalty cannot be squared with this Court's decision in Coker v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:40 am
In the recent case of Jacobson v. [read post]
31 May 2015, 9:53 am
The Texas Appeals case, Reyna v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 3:27 am
United States v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 9:11 am
Seven Justices joined fully in the ruling, and two partially dissented, in Winkelman v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:47 am
In K.E.M. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 10:10 pm
" United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 9:18 am
Most recently, Watso v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 11:59 am
Harris v. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 9:58 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 4:36 pm
In Lynchburg Division of Social Services v. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 9:29 am
Render v. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 3:50 pm
The First Circuit Federal Defender Blog points to a Memo by the Federal Defenders, in which argues that a provision of the Adam Wash Act, which purports to prevent the defense from viewing or analyzing child pr0n is unconstitutional because 1) defendants would not get a chance to meaningfully analyze all evidence; and 2) it eliminates the presumption of innocence, since the court seems to have to take the government's word that the material, is, in fact, child pr0n. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 12:41 pm
Through a long opinion that is not easily summarized, the Ninth Circuit speaks to a range of child porn federal sentencing issues today in in US v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 11:36 am
In today’s case (Nanaimo-Ladysmith School District No.68 v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 7:32 pm
In Haaland v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 6:27 am
As the Second Circuit Court of Appeals noted its recent decision United States v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 5:45 am
Code §154.130. [9] Rodriguez v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 5:45 am
Code §154.130. [9] Rodriguez v. [read post]
19 Jul 2006, 1:22 pm
The father of the child claimed that he should not have to pay child support... [read post]