Search for: "Claimant(s)"
Results 2301 - 2320
of 26,367
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2012, 5:13 am
Where the eye is injured but not destroyed, the issue is whether the eye was lost for all practical intents and purposes, i.e. where the injured eye does not contribute materially to the claimant’s vision in conjunction with the uninjured eye. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 11:00 pm
This blog was co-authored by: Caitlyn Gardiner, Candidate Attorney In this case, the Claimant sued for damages, alleging that the hospital staff’s negligence during her labour resulted in her child’s cerebral palsy. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 9:04 am
Where the eye is injured but not destroyed, the issue is whether the eye was lost for all practical intents and purposes, i.e. where the injured eye does not contribute materially to the claimant’s vision in conjunction with the uninjured eye. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 5:00 am
Following an investigation, and after the claim was referred to the Office of Administrative Law Judges (“OALJ”), the employer withdrew its controversion of Claimant’s claim for benefits under the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 10:49 pm
The arbitrator upheld the claimant’s claim and awarded benefits. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 4:08 am
Employer’s filing appropriate Workers’ Compensation claims forms defeats “statute of limitation” objection to payment employee’s claimMatter of Kwadzogah v New York City Health & Hosp. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 7:31 am
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court allowed the reimbursement request stating that, while the date of the medical service preceded insurer’s application for supersedeas reimbursement, the bill for claimant’s surgery did not arrive until six weeks after the denial of supersedeas. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 7:30 am
The committee’s chairman encouraged the parties to settle upon discussion based on such tentative opinion. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 6:00 pm
To begin with, the claimants disagree about the scope of jurisdiction that UNCLOS entitles them to over the South China Sea’s waters. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 5:52 am
As a result, it could be argued that it is unlikely that much “actual damage” to reputation will have been caused: the claimant’s followers are unlikely to pay attention to the defendant’s views and the defendant’s followers are unlikely to have a high opinion of the claimant. [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 7:51 am
The ALJ denied the appeal and claimant’s benefits were not reinstated. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 1:44 pm
The case involved a heavy over-concentration of the Claimant’s UBS account in proprietary UBS closed-end bond funds pursuant to UBS’s recommendations. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 10:48 am
The Panel also awarded all of Claimant’s attorneys fees to be paid by UBS. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 11:43 am
It is not necessarily based on the severity of the disability, but rather the degree to which it affects the claimant’s ability to work. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 9:18 am
, the claimant, Mr. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Failure to comply precisely with these requirements will prevent claimants from recovering for their claims. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 2:23 pm
This information should "includ[e] a statement that the decision of a claimant as to whether or not to submit a benefit dispute to the voluntary level of appeal will have no effect on the claimant's rights to any other benefits under the plan and information about the applicable rules, the claimant's right to representation, the process for selecting the decisionmaker, and the circumstances, if any, that may affect the impartiality of the… [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 10:25 am
Claimants allege that they have suffered personal injuries, some of them fatal, from the use of Bayer’s drospirenone-containing oral contraceptive products such as Yasmin™ and/or YAZ™ or from the use of Ocella™ and/or Gianvi™, generic versions of Yasmin™ and YAZ™, respectively, marketed by Barr Laboratories, Inc. in the United States. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 5:16 pm
The Claimants and the Defendant disagree as to what took place at Mrs Khan’s home. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 11:27 am
Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 126 F.3d 228, 237 (4th Cir. 1997), the regulations implementing this provision require that upon request, a claimant be provided all “information relevant to the claimant’s claim for benefits,” 29 C.F.R. [read post]
