Search for: "Court, U.S. Supreme Court"
Results 2301 - 2320
of 99,558
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 7:59 am
Supreme Court disagreed with the Bush Administration a year later in its very first climate change case, the landmark Massachusetts v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:44 am
Here’s the Friday morning read: Leo rejects Senate subpoena from panel probing gifts to Supreme Court justices (Tobi Raji, The Washington Post) Senate Democrats subpoena Leonard Leo in Supreme Court ethics probe (John Fritze and Devan Cole, CNN) Former cop urges Supreme Court to throw out Jan. 6 charge wielded against Donald Trump (Bart Jansen, USA Today) A U.S. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Gubler (Arizona State University), on Monday, April 8, 2024 Tags: corporate boards, corporate law, directors, Fiduciary duties, Shareholder value, Stakeholders Delaware Supreme Court Holds Entire Fairness Applicable to All Conflicted Controller Transactions Posted by Gregory V. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Gubler (Arizona State University), on Monday, April 8, 2024 Tags: corporate boards, corporate law, directors, Fiduciary duties, Shareholder value, Stakeholders Delaware Supreme Court Holds Entire Fairness Applicable to All Conflicted Controller Transactions Posted by Gregory V. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
Special Counsel Urges Supreme Court to Reject Trump’s Immunity Claim MSN – Ann Marimow (Washington Post) | Published: 4/8/2024 Special counsel Jack Smith urged the U.S. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:48 pm
Supreme Court decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Although the U.S. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 5:59 pm
In answering that question, the Supreme Court applied its recently minted, two-step methodology for assessing the extraterritorial reach of U.S. statutes generally. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 4:29 pm
Supreme Court Weighs in, Again, on Forfeiture of Counsel, N.C. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:27 am
Supreme Court ruled on a case from North Carolina. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:27 am
To get liberals on board with a modest amount of privacy preemption, I charge, the bill would effectively overturn the Supreme Court's Harvard admissions decision and impose race, gender, and other quotas on a host of other activities that have avoided them so far. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:25 am
But Justice Mitchell is now a controversial figure, ever since he wrote the Alabama Supreme Court's opinion in LePage v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:05 am
This can be accomplished with a 501(c)(4) where lobbying is permitted in an unlimited amount, provided such lobbying is directly related to the exempt purpose, and so long as such activity is not for private gain.[27] Political campaign activities are more restricted if such political campaigning prevents the organization from being “primarily engaged” in social welfare work.[28] One of the most high profile instances of a 501(c)(4) engaging in political campaigning relates to… [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 7:56 am
For instance, she was asked to comment about abortion after the Arizona supreme court resurrected the country’s most restrictive abortion ban. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 4:57 am
On April 2 and 3, 2024, senior U.S. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 7:27 pm
IP Watchdog: “The U.S. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 5:33 pm
Thus, neither the U.S. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 3:45 pm
Thus, although bankruptcy law in the United States does have components that may promote convergence, such as chapter 15 of the U.S. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 12:39 pm
For starters, Chief Judge Sutton has long taken the policy that en banc review should be used sparingly, as the Supreme Court can correct errors. [read post]
