Search for: "Doe v Great Expectations" Results 2301 - 2320 of 3,541
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2022, 11:00 am by Sandy Levinson
  Mountain climbing clearly passes the test; competitive eating apparently does as well. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Chile Eboe-Osuji
Much of the world was riveted for two days earlier this month as lawyers chastised and defended Israel on the floor of the International Court of Justice in South Africa’s lawsuit alleging that Israel has been violating its obligations under the Convention against Genocide. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
I was expecting the worst when I saw the caption Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
”  Does anyone expect those who disagree with us regarding any truly important “legal issue” to be persuaded by what Antonin Scalia dismissively termed the “argle bargle” of standard-form legal argument? [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 11:03 am by Lindsay Griffiths
He said that we've been talking a lot about the mandate, but would talk about it less so in the future, because it doesn't affect a great many people. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Paul, 505 U.S. 377, 384-390 (1992) (explaining that the First Amendment does not permit the government to engage in viewpoint discrimination under the guise of regulating unprotected speech), the potential for abuse of power in these areas is simply too great. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 9:44 am
A link to the video of part of the Debate may be accessed here.It will be interesting to see where all of this leads--more, perhaps, for the sociology of law, than for the merits of evolving cultural and societal expectations that are expected to be enforced through the use of the criminal law of states. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 1:16 pm by Robert Chesney
Some are exactly what you would expect, such as “information security and data privacy. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 10:34 am by Florian Mueller
First, the statute does not establish a requirement that a particular thing has happened. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:38 pm by David Greene
It treats them exactly the same, and does so on purpose. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 7:17 am
This morning Lord Neuberger handed down the judgment of the UK Supreme Court in the Trunki case, PMS International Limited v Magmatic Limited [2016] UKSC 12. [read post]
4 May 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
 John Marshall ended his first paragraph in McCulloch v. [read post]