Search for: "Does 1-71"
Results 2301 - 2320
of 2,540
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2009, 1:45 am
Tillett was decided on a full record after conviction and therefore does not speak directly to the issue. 763 F.2d at 630-61. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 12:06 am
United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486, 71 S. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 12:42 am
After all, he's a criminal history level 1, right? [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:55 am
Id. at 870-71 (citations omitted). [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 7:30 pm
Let the interview begin… 1. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 6:30 am
It does not apply to claims of recklessness or gross negligence. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 10:21 pm
(1/15/09)We Have A Winner! [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
*The question of compelling a public officer or employee to testify or risk termination was considered by the Court of Appeals in Matt v LaRocca, 71 NY2d 154, cert denied 486 US 1007. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 10:10 pm
Botero-Ospina, 71 F.3d 783 (10th Cir. 1995). [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 1:40 am
" [FN98] (p. 464) That some such gambles pay off handsomely does nothing to demonstrate that rents are preserved, for the many less famous failures must be considered. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 2:50 am
Rep. 109-14, 109th Cong., 1st Sess.2005, reprinted in 2005 U.S.C.CA.N. 3, *70-71, *66-67. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 5:34 am
Thirdly, as the Court admitted (para 33), the Italian court in considering whether to give effect to an arbitration agreement between the parties is not applying a rule in the Brussels I Regulation but, instead, is applying the rules contained in the New York Convention, as a convention which (to the extent that its effect is not excluded from scope by Art 1(2)(d)) takes priority over the Regulation's rules by virtue of Art 71(1) of the Regulation. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
: No access to ‘non-minor amendments’ on EU website (Class 46) EPO gets access to India’s traditional knowledge digital library (Spicy IP) Germany Bundesgerichtshof clarifies circumstances under which work may be considered ‘not published’ under s 71 Copyright Act in case concerning Vivaldi’s ‘Motezuma’ (IPKat) Federal Patent Court: ‘Die Drachenjäger’ (the dragon hunter)… [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:23 am
Where the parents are unavailable and the State is the guardian, what obligation does international law impose then? [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:42 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 4:12 pm
I accept the formulation of Ouseley J in O’Brien v Basildon District Council [2007] 1 P&CR 16. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 4:12 pm
I accept the formulation of Ouseley J in O’Brien v Basildon District Council [2007] 1 P&CR 16. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 1:17 pm
Petitioners argue that New Jersey's actions regarding their eligibility have created only two options (1) to enter the nursing facility for 30 days or (2) wait five years. [read post]
17 Jan 2009, 1:48 pm
Found., Inc., 272 U.S. 1, 14-15, 47 S.Ct. 1, 71 L.Ed. 131 (1926) (“The presumption of regularity supports the official acts of public officers, and, in the absence of clear evidence to the contrary, courts presume that they have properly discharged their official duties. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 4:57 am
The Secretaries of State and Homeland Security, as well as the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, also may exempt any individual from US-VISIT. 8 CFR 235.1(f)(1)(iv)(B). --------------------------------------- 2 Effective January 23, 2007, 8 CFR 235(d)(1)(iv) was redesignated as 8 CFR 235.1(f)(1)(iv). 71 FR 68412 (Nov. 24, 2006). --------------------------------------- B. [read post]
