Search for: "GROUP v. STATE" Results 2301 - 2320 of 37,528
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2010, 3:06 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Yetkin v London Borough of Newham [2010] EWCA Civ 776 (13 July 2010) Badger Trust v The Welsh Ministers [2010] EWCA Civ 807 (13 July 2010) Ghadami & Anor v Lyon Cole Insurance Group Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 767 (13 July 2010) FlooHorridge (t/a Newford Parts Centre) v Downshire House (Reproductions) Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 777 (13 July 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Willett & Anor v R. [2010] EWCA Crim… [read post]
20 May 2015, 2:46 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
It stated however that the defence costs are different as they were incurred in defending the claim which had the insurer’s consent. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 3:07 am by sally
Supreme Court W (Algeria) & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 8 (7 March 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Gedeon Richter Plc v Bayer Pharma AG [2012] EWCA Civ 235 (07 March 2012) Miah & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 261 (07 March 2012) Lamichhane v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 260 (07 March 2012) Zieleniewski v Scheyd… [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 12:36 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 3:59 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Permission to appeal to the Supreme Court was granted on the two questions stated above. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The interests of the Governor and Lieutenant Governor could be inequitably affected if we declare that the concurrent resolution is void and enjoin defendant from paying their salaries at the rates set in that resolution (see Matter of Jim Ludtka Sporting Goods, Inc. v City of Buffalo School Dist., 48 AD3d 1103, 1104 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 704 [2008]; Matter of Romeo v New York State Dept. of Educ., 41 AD3d 1102, 1104 [2007]; Matter of Boston Culinary Group,… [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The interests of the Governor and Lieutenant Governor could be inequitably affected if we declare that the concurrent resolution is void and enjoin defendant from paying their salaries at the rates set in that resolution (see Matter of Jim Ludtka Sporting Goods, Inc. v City of Buffalo School Dist., 48 AD3d 1103, 1104 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 704 [2008]; Matter of Romeo v New York State Dept. of Educ., 41 AD3d 1102, 1104 [2007]; Matter of Boston Culinary Group,… [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:53 am by sally
Supreme Court F & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 17 (21 April 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Lui v Chong [2010] EWCA Civ 398 (21 April 2010) Williams v Lishman, Sidwell, Campbell & Price Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 418 (21 April 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Phoenix Partners Group Llp v Asoyag [2010] EWHC 846 (QB) (21 April 2010) High Court (Administrative… [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 8:54 pm by Bona Law PC
This hardly seemed fair, so the United States Supreme Court in the classic case of Illinois Brick v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 12:00 pm by Scott Birkey
No Density Bonus for this Coastal Project In Kalnel Gardens, LLC v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 12:00 pm by Scott Birkey
No Density Bonus for this Coastal Project In Kalnel Gardens, LLC v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:09 am by Amy Howe
Driehaus, in which the Court held that a group which has been accused of violating a state law prohibiting false statements during a political campaign and that is at risk of being accused again can challenge the constitutionality of that law in court, and Abramski v. [read post]