Search for: "Holding v. State"
Results 2301 - 2320
of 63,298
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2011, 12:30 pm
On Wednesday, April 27, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 2:28 am
In the context of a Katrina-related claim, in its recent decision in Sher v. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 11:25 am
Heather Cessna and I recently filed a cert petition in State v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 3:19 pm
Shuman (1987, holding that mandatory death sentences are invalid -- even for prison inmates serving a life sentence who are convicted of a murder in prison), Riggins v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 1:41 pm
In United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 4:07 pm
In United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:23 pm
(Chambers v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:08 am
In NeuroRepair v. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 9:28 am
United States, 2020 WL 398625 (D.C. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
In Rucho v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 4:15 am
On July 8, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), in Fitbit, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 1:15 pm
On October 27, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed a decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) in Corcamore, LLC v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 3:28 am
" Here's the idea:The last few years have seen numerous cases in various jurisdictions seeking to hold foreign States and their agents accountable for serious human rights violations. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 8:39 am
The Ohio Supreme Court voted to hold a hearing to determine whether they should reopen a worker's comp case, State ex rel. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 2:44 pm
On Wednesday, the Court heard oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 5:09 am
Loeffler v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 11:29 am
The California Supreme Court unanimously holds today that people found not guilty by reason of insanity have a statutory right to not testify at subsequent proceedings in which the state wants to continue their commitment to a state hospital on the grounds that the patient's continuing mental disorder represents a "substantial danger" to others. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 1:43 pm
We hold that the “maximum term of imprisonment” for a defen-dant’s prior state drug offense is the maximum sentence applicable to his offense when he was convicted of it.... [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 12:41 pm
Citing its recent decision in United States v. [read post]
