Search for: "J. H.1" Results 2301 - 2320 of 4,859
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2015, 7:01 pm by Bill Marler
The agency also has received 392 calls through its hotline (1-800-868-0404) from the public. [read post]
This option is also available to nonimmigrants in B, E, F, H, I, J, L, M, O, P or Q status. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 4:02 am
The issues to be presented at argument are: (1) Whether the trial court erred in setting aside the jury's verdict under Trial Rule 59(J); and (2) Whether the trial court erred in setting aside the jury's verdict under Trial Rule 60(B)(3). [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 6:06 am
Roper, Stanford University, on Thursday, September 1, 2016 Tags: Basic, Disclosure, Erica John Fund v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 7:33 am by Charles O'Mahony
  Article 27(1)(h) does place an obligation on State Parties to the Convention to “Promote the employment of persons with disabilities in the private sector through appropriate policies and measures” and in Article 27(1)(j) to promote the acquisition by persons with disabilities of work experience in the open labour market. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:54 am by James F. Hennessy and Taylor Grant
For “Harm” level non-compliance (Levels G, H, I), regardless of the nursing home’s history, the facility will face CMPs at the highest amount option within the appropriate range under the CMP Analytic Tool. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 6:56 am by Latham & Watkins LLP
The guidance is significant for organisations that transfer personal data from the DIFC to the US and such organisations should urgently review the basis upon which they transfer personal data from the DIFC to the US to ensure that they continue to comply with the DIFC Data Protection Law (No 1 of 2007). [read post]
9 May 2011, 11:13 pm by Tessa Shepperson
If you are interested in this sort of thing, there is an excellent book An Introduction to English Legal History by J H Baker which explains it all in detail. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
When an applicant is represented by a professional representative, then, according to decision J 5/80 [headnote 1], the request for re-establishment cannot be acceded to unless the representative himself can show that he has taken the due care required of an applicant by A 122(1). [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
There was also a PTR in the cases of NT1 v Google and NT2 v Google before Nicklin J (who indicated, however, that Warby J was likely to be the trial judge). [read post]