Search for: "Jack Doe" Results 2301 - 2320 of 6,689
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2017, 11:14 am by Joseph Fishkin
”  The point here is, in Jack’s words, precisely “to maintain polarization and whip up the Republican base into a frenzy of anger against their opponents. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 9:52 am by Amy Howe
The case is a challenge by Jack Phillips, a Colorado man who describes himself as a “cake artist” and argues that the state’s public accommodations law violates the First Amendment by requiring him to create custom wedding cakes for same-sex weddings, in violation of his religious beliefs. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 9:40 am by Stephen Honig
  History and logic suggest such things as diversification; does anyone put 100% into the new economy? [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 3:39 am by Jon Katz
Coming from a privileged or hard-scrabble background — and preferring brie and Chardonnay versus Pizza Hut and Blatz beer (explaining why both the late Jack Litman who liked fine restaurants paired with fine wine and Tony Serra who repairs trouser tears with tape, both were and are excellent criminal defense lawyers) — does not answer the question, nor does being a raging “progressive”, Reaganite, Communist, nor Libertarian. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 12:09 pm by K. Lindsay Rakers
The person who is experiencing the abuse could suffer from similar side effects as does those who fall victim of school bullying. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am by Jack Sharman
First, the short-version video: Jack Sharman – Learning in Congress from Legal Filmworks Unlimited on Vimeo. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 7:56 am by Samm Sacks
As Jack Ma once said of Alibaba’s relationship with the government, “be in love with them, but don’t marry them”. [read post]
30 May 2017, 10:33 pm
Appointed Person issues first appeal decision in a design case Martin Howe QC issued the first judgement under the new Appointed Person system, following the 2014 reform, on a case concerning a Union Jack garment design, which unsurprisingly was found to be invalid. [read post]
30 May 2017, 11:58 am by Amy Howe
If the voter does not respond to that notice and does not vote over the next four years, Ohio removes her from the list of registered voters and requires her to register again. [read post]
30 May 2017, 8:30 am by Josh Blackman
This conclusion does not appreciate the important distinction between entry and visa issuance under the statute. [read post]
29 May 2017, 6:00 am by Kit Case
Specifically, Carr alleged that her Sanderson Farms coworker, Webb, deliberately struck her with a pallet jack multiple times. [read post]
28 May 2017, 10:00 pm by Colby Duren
In direct response to the Jack in the Box outbreak, the U.S. [read post]
24 May 2017, 10:00 pm by Bill Marler
Such environmental contamination does not always spread to the eggs, and it is unclear what actions Mr. [read post]
24 May 2017, 8:48 am by Bill Marler
  I think Jack and Peter need some time away to think about this. [read post]
23 May 2017, 10:45 am by Russell Spivak
., deleting offending posts from one individual without removing identical messages or banning users without taking steps to ensure that the same person does not subsequently rejoin the website under a different moniker). [read post]
22 May 2017, 9:19 am by Quinta Jurecic
They will be particularly surprised when they learn that most people assume that as trusted subordinates of the president, they lie not as colorfully as he does, but just as routinely. [read post]
Jack and Ben noted earlier this week that three of Trump’s proposed candidates are partisan figures, and thus per se unacceptable as a breach of the long-standing norm of non-political FBI directors. [read post]
17 May 2017, 10:20 am by Matthew Kahn
Josh Blackman argues that even if the government does not prevail in either the Ninth Circuit or Fourth Circuit cases regarding the revised immigration executive order, it may find victory at the Supreme Court. [read post]
The Post does not report whether the White House also notified the foreign ally who provided the information of the compromise. [read post]
15 May 2017, 3:52 pm by Amy Howe
But the en banc appeals court reversed, holding that the policy does not violate the Second Amendment. [read post]