Search for: "Jacks v. State" Results 2301 - 2320 of 2,864
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2008, 2:16 pm
As none other than Michael Mukasey argued at the time (Padilla v. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 7:00 pm
   [Memphis Planned Parenthood, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:59 am by Matthew Flinn
One of the cases which would no doubt encourage David Cameron and Jack Straw in that view is the very recent case of Hassan-Daniel v HMRC [2010] EWCA Civ 1443. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 10:01 pm by News Desk
Supreme Court decides to take up the appeals of Austin “Jack” and Peter DeCoster v. [read post]
27 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
United States, constitutes a warp-speed shift to a new constitutional universe. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 5:46 pm by INFORRM
United States USA today had a piece “Rudy Giuliani’s ‘Borat 2’ scene: What can he do about it legally? [read post]
19 Aug 2006, 11:19 am
After all, the background of Marbury v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 3:59 am by Rosalind English
Case comment by Elizabeth-Anne Gumbel QC and Justin Levinson (Barristers for the Claimant, MAGA) MAGA v The Trustees of the Birmingham Archdiocese of the Roman Catholic Church [2010] EWCA Civ 256, Court of Appeal (Lord Neuberger MR, Lord Justice Longmore and Lady Justice Smith) (read judgment) This appeal was brought with permission from the trial Judge Mr Justice Jack. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
” On her reading, the constitutionalism of care and equality that characterizes the end state after misogyny is insufficiently critical of “a certain degree of expected and beneficial maternal “sacrifice” that is for the “common good,” even if the state compensates it. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm by Daphne Keller
A person signing a DMCA notice must state a good faith belief that the use is not authorized, declare her authority to act under penalty of perjury, and risk damages for misrepresentation under section 512(f).[3] That source of protection has not technically disappeared, but its value is largely lost when notices are generated not by a person, but by a machine. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
Defendant also fails to attach a copy of its own answer, but does not state that its motion is one for pre-answer dismissal. [read post]