Search for: "Jones v. District Court" Results 2301 - 2320 of 3,121
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2010, 1:29 pm
Based on Jones and Martin, we conclude the district court did not err by denying the motion to suppress the evidence. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:09 am by Michael C. Smith
  Greg's practice involved a lot of appearances at the Supreme Court, the most recent of which was on October 13 when he argued on behalf of a Texas district attorney in a DNA evidence case in Skinner v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 6:56 am by sustainabilitypepper
Jones III of United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania held [...] [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 9:17 pm by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
The Supreme Court left that second question open when, in U.S. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 3:32 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The Supreme Court left that second question open when, in U.S. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 12:20 pm by Geoffrey Manne
In light of its finding of near identity between EchoStar’s original and modified DVRs, the District Court relied on KSM Fastening Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 11:25 am by Mark Murakami
New Jones Act/maintenance and cure case from the First Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 2:36 pm
As briefly reported in this previous post, the Fifth District Court of Appeal today reversed the grant of summary adjudication by the Fresno trial court in favor of the Episcopal Church (USA) and Bishop Jerry Lamb. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:48 am by Mike
District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 4:48 am by cdw
In Ohio, an intermediate appellate court in  State v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am by Amanda Rice
Yesterday the Court heard oral argument in two cases:  CSX Transportation, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 11:00 pm by Mike
Curry (9th Cir. 2010) the case is remanded to BPH to make a finding - the District Court cannot compel the warden to release the prisoner on parole. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
  There is already jurisdiction, deriving from the case of Jameel v Dow Jones ([2005] QB 946) to strike out a case as an abuse of the process if the publication does not amount to a “real and substantial tort”. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 12:19 pm by Bruce Nye
Corrections USA, et al., Eastern District No. [read post]