Search for: "King v. State"
Results 2301 - 2320
of 6,215
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2016, 7:29 am
Under this doctrine, states, counties, and cities were immune from suit based on a tradition of English common law referred to as “rex non potest peccare,” which meant “the king can do no wrong. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 2:54 pm
The mattresses ranged in size from small to king size. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
Johnson and United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 12:00 pm
Martin Luther King Jr. called Rev. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 8:29 pm
Madison, Justice Joseph Story in his Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, and the modern Supreme Court in Edmond v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:31 pm
” In the same way, Justice Louis Brandeis wrote in his dissent in Olmstead v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm
Moreover, the Court, like King Canute, cannot stop the tide. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:28 pm
In March 2014, during the phone hacking trial of Andy Coulson, Rebekah Brooks and others, GQ magazine published an article headlined “The Court Without A King”. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:00 pm
Cranmer accepted a commission to write a propaganda treatise in the king’s interest, stating the course he proposed and defending it by arguments from Scripture, the Fathers, and the decrees of general councils. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 6:40 am
State v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
King County, a case recently before the Washington State Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 12:01 pm
King v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 11:00 am
State v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 11:00 am
State v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
Lane; and (2) whether the United States Supreme Court has jurisdiction over a state court determination of retroactivity of a case on collateral review, when a state has both adopted and applied Teague. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:56 am
Next month, King must approve the settlement. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:02 pm
On the same day Dingemans J gave judgment in Lokhova v Tymula ([2016] EWHC 225 (QB))(heard 26 and 27 January 2016). [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 6:59 am
King (the DNA case): "The Court’s assertion that DNA is being taken, not to solve crimes, but to identify those in the State’s custody, taxes the credulity of the credulous. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 12:23 am
Dissenting again in Lee v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 5:02 am
The judge stated that “it is quite plain in my view that it is a “lifestyle” interview” and accepted that he had “no authority in that capacity to make statements”. [read post]
