Search for: "Liability and Insurers for each Defendant" Results 2301 - 2320 of 3,472
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2013, 3:00 pm
The defendants in each case applied for insurance coverage and this coverage was supplied by the plaintiff. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:00 pm
The defendants in each case applied for insurance coverage and this coverage was supplied by the plaintiff. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Liability was at issue. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 9:03 pm
Syllabus (summary) A wayward Chevy struck a tree Whose owner sued defendants three. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 3:44 pm
The agent advised her that he offered to pay the bodily injury liability limit of $10,000 but cautioned that because of the serious injuries it might be impossible to settle within the policy limits. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:40 am
Sane State Farm Adjuster State Farm's Blog Advice on Negotiating Car Accident Claims with Each Insurance CompanyInteresting Plaintiff's Lawyer Tactics in State Farm Bad Faith Claim [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 12:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
But because there are numerous limitations to the protection availably under the immunity statutes, it remains important for these organizations and their representatives to ensure that the organizations have and maintain a comprehensive program of liability insurance, including in particular broad, state-of-the- market D&O insurance. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 8:50 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Stamer has 25 years of experience helping employers; employee benefit plans and their sponsors, administrators, fiduciaries; employee leasing, recruiting, staffing and other professional employment organizations; and others design, administer and defend innovative workforce, compensation, employee benefit  and management policies and practices. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:54 pm by Lisa Baird
The consequences of failing to adhere to each of the above deadlines could result in Medicare enforcing a higher lien demand post-settlement. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 12:39 pm by WIMS
      On appeal, a central issue involved the proper method under Massachusetts law for allocating liability for long-term environmental contamination where the defendant GCL insurer had provided coverage for the risk for only a portion of the time during which the contamination took place. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 7:53 am by emagraken
The cause of action against each defendant was the same. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 4:51 am by David J. DePaolo
I think one of the more interesting aspects of workers' compensation litigation is the relationship of the parties, and in particular the relationship of the defense parties: employer, carrier/administrator and the attorney.Most employers believe that when the insurance company hires a lawyer to defend a claim that the lawyer either has some duty towards the employer's interests, or that the lawyer should be communicating with the employer.Back when I was practicing work comp… [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
  And if there’s one thing that’s not right, it’s having the liability of a defendant non-manufacturer turn on what its competitors did (or didn’t do). [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:16 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In such a scenario, will each tortfeasor defendant's delay damages be assessed against only that percentage of the liability assigned to each tortfeasor as that percentage is the only portion of the verdict that is legally recoverable by the plaintiff against that tortfeasor? [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 5:47 am by Finch McCranie, LLP
Some defendants who cause great damage have little or no insurance coverage. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 9:24 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
   Her experience includes extensive work representing advising these and other clients, governmental bodies, insurance and financial services organizations, third party administrators and others to develop, design, defend and administer creative health, disability, severance and other employee benefit and compensation arrangements, products and services. [read post]
12 Jan 2013, 3:08 pm
The issues for the court’s determination is whether or not, pursuant to the insurance policy of the law firm the aggregate policy limit should apply where the appellee’s attorney committed multiple wrongful acts by failing to join several defendants in his medical malpractice action; whether or not, because each of the defendants had separate insurance coverage available to pay a damage award, appellee had multiple claims against his attorney.… [read post]