Search for: "London v. State" Results 2301 - 2320 of 4,150
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2016, 4:59 am
  The panel provided a brief reminder of the key UK and CJEU cases dealing with the meaning of (1) an act of “communication” and (2) a “public”, both in the context of re-transmission of broadcast signals (SGAE v Rafael Hotels Case C-306/05, SCF v Marco Del Corso Case C-135/10, ITV v TV Catchup Case C-607/11 and Reha Training v GEMA Case C-117/5) and P2P networks (Polydor v… [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:12 pm by David Lat
They point out that this is 3M’s third bite at the apple — the company previously filed two similar cases in New York state court. [read post]
1 May 2015, 12:39 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
The only alternative, a mass exodus out of London, already happening for many homelessness clients who can’t afford to rent there any more, despite the decision of Nzolomesa v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:58 am by NL
Mr Justice Eady's judgment contains a potted history of human rights and public law challenges to summary possession proceedings, from Kay v Lambeth to Manchester CC v Pinnock and Hounslow LBC v Powell. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:58 am by NL
Mr Justice Eady's judgment contains a potted history of human rights and public law challenges to summary possession proceedings, from Kay v Lambeth to Manchester CC v Pinnock and Hounslow LBC v Powell. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 3:29 am by David Pocklington
[4] e.g. s9 Greater London Council (General Powers) Act 1976 and s74  London Local Authorities Act 2007. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 7:33 am
AFSCME and several state pension funds, including the nation's largest, the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS), sent letters to the SEC in mid-November urging Cox to let the AFSCME v. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
New Brunswick Teachers’ Assn., 2001 NBCA 62, which adopted the following reasons of Lord Denning in London Artists Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:47 pm by Dave
 ”It is a striking feature of the scheme – and lies at the heart of this application – that the cap applies equally to a childless couple in an area with cheap and plentiful social housing as it does to a lone parent mother of several children in inner London compelled to rent on the private market. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:47 pm by Dave
 ”It is a striking feature of the scheme – and lies at the heart of this application – that the cap applies equally to a childless couple in an area with cheap and plentiful social housing as it does to a lone parent mother of several children in inner London compelled to rent on the private market. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 12:10 am by INFORRM
Yesterday’s decision in MGN v United Kingdom (Case No. 39401/04) has become the most discussed media law case of the year so far. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 11:33 am
'" It said "the literal interpretation of the concept of public use which the petitioners urge us to apply was abandoned long before the United States Supreme Court concluded [in Kelo v City of New London (545 US 469 [2005])] that the use of eminent domain to carry out an economic development plan does not violate the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.. [read post]