Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 2301 - 2320
of 4,051
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2012, 12:00 am
Lord Walker stated at paragraph 79 that the Woolwich principle should be construed, “as to cover all sums paid to a public authority in response to (and sufficiently causally connected with) an apparent statutory requirement to pay tax which (in fact and in law) is not lawfully due. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 5:44 pm
The appeal by way of case stated in the “Twitter joke” case (Chambers v DPP) has been allowed. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 5:56 am
John Cooper QC was brought in for the final appeal before the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Judge. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 9:49 am
Paul Chambers v DPP [2012] EWHC 2157 - Read judgment The famous ‘Twitter joke’ conviction of Paul Chambers has been overturned on appeal, bringing welcome clarity to what is and what is not an offence of this type. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 9:24 am
” The Secretary of State appealed these findings. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 7:03 am
RT (Zimbabwe) and others (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 38 - read judgment It is no answer to a refugee claim to say that the individual concerned should avoid persecution by lying and feigning loyalty to a regime which he does not support. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 5:17 pm
He based this finding on the words of Lord Osborne in H M Advocate v William Frederick Ian Beggs (No2) (2002 S.L.T. 139). [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 1:24 pm
Kent Services Ltd.19 The rule was effectively applied 100 years ago by the House of Lords in TW Thomas & Co. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 6:12 am
However, it is the postscript to the judgment of Lord Justice McFarlane (right) to which I wish to refer here. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:24 pm
As with Entick, the case of U.S. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Woodrow v Johansson, heard 19 January 2012 (HHJ Parkes QC) Miller v Associated Newspapers heard 21 to 25 May 2012 (Sharp J) SKA v CRH, heard 10 and 11 July 2012 (Nicola Davies J) Lord Ashcroft v Foley heard 20 July 2012 (Eady J) [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 1:24 am
” So claimed Lord Pearce in Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd v Shatwell [1965] AC 656. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:54 pm
Swift v Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWHC 2000 (QB) (18 July 2012). [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 3:56 am
Khaira v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 1:52 pm
Panetta (Al-Awlaki v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 9:42 am
The result of this confusion is that LGBT's see themselves as "victims", and people like V. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
Hassan v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm
Lambeth LBC v Kay [2006] UKHL 10; [2006] 2 A.C. 465; [2006] H.L.R. 22, per Lord Nichols [61] and Lord Hope [64]. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm
Lambeth LBC v Kay [2006] UKHL 10; [2006] 2 A.C. 465; [2006] H.L.R. 22, per Lord Nichols [61] and Lord Hope [64]. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:43 am
The Court of Appeal decision The Court of Appeal reviewed a number of authorities on the meaning of “house”, including Lake v Bennett [1970] 1 Q.B. 663, Tandon v Trustees of Spurgeons Homes [1982] A.C. 755, Boss Holdings Ltd v Grosvenor West End Properties Ltd [2008] 1 W.L.R. 289, (where the House of Lords held that, when deciding whether a building had been designed or adapted for living in, one is largely concerned with the physical state of… [read post]
