Search for: "MATTER OF T F" Results 2301 - 2320 of 13,943
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2021, 1:20 pm by Ilya Somin
But even if I was right about this, it still doesn't show that the states gave some kind of blanket consent to federal delegation of eminent domain power to private parties. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
"[10] The Court reasoned, [T]he case boils down to whether the department's manner of gaining control of the federal funds involves "other legal process," as the statute uses that term. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 8:22 am by Russell Knight
Furthermore, matters subject to stipulation may relate to procedural or even evidentiary matters. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am by Russell Knight
For unmarried parents “[t]he court may order child support payments to be made for a period prior to the commencement of the action. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 7:18 am by Marcia Coyle
She and her friend, with middle fingers raised, wrote “F… school f… softball f… cheer f… everything. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm by Susan Landau
But the SPMs weren't privy to information about software problems. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm by Susan Landau
But the SPMs weren't privy to information about software problems. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 1:21 pm by Kevin
” But again, to him that doesn’t matter, because 1868. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 7:42 am by Vishnu Kannan
[T]here is no actual broadening of the universe of people who would have access” to these reports. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 8:55 am by Arthur F. Coon
”  (In the unpublished portion of its opinion, which won’t be analyzed in further detail in this post, the Court held the County did not impermissibly defer mitigation, and it declined to consider two other arguments because they added nothing to the fair argument analysis and/or constituted new theories or arguments raised for the first time on appeal.) [read post]
” The bill would similarly amend the California Family Rights Act (CFRA), Gov’t Code § 12945.2, to add “designated person,” defined as “a person identified by the employee at the time the employee requests family care and medical leave,” as a person for whom an employee may take leave for family care and medical leave, similar to many existing municipal paid sick leave laws. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 12:29 pm by admin
In short order, on October 23, 1996, Judge Weinstein issued a short, published opinion, in which he ducked the pending Rule 702 motions, and he granted partial summary judgment on the claims of systemic disease.[10] Only the lawyers involved in the matters would have known that there was no pending motion for summary judgment! [read post]