Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 2301 - 2320
of 5,964
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2011, 6:09 am
Mar.22, 2011) (citation & quotation marks omitted); see United Mine Workers of Am. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 1:19 pm
Supreme Court DecisionDueling Still Not Advisable in OregonGuy Who Got a C on Constitutional-Amendment Paper GETS CONSTITUTION AMENDED [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 8:06 am
Uncredited use of another’s photos in connection with the sale of goods or services “must be pursued as copyright claims. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:02 am
It feels good to be the cool kid and not the nerd. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 4:23 am
Specimen of Use/Nonuse: Precedential No. 9: Business Card Specimen Does Not Prove Use of Collective Membership Mark, Says TTAB Pan American Convention: Precedential No. 38: TTAB Orders Cancellation of COHIBA Registrations Under Pan American Convention, Rejects Issue Preclusion Defense Discovery/Evidence/Procedure: Precedential No. 10: TTAB Confirms that Once Opposer's Mark is Registered, Priority is No Longer an Issue TTAB Summarily Sustains BITVISION Opposition Due to… [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 12:19 pm
The Panel found that “Respondent’s failure to make an active use of the disputed domain name for the last three years is evidence that Respondent lacks rights and legitimate interests in the disputed domain name as Respondent is not using the disputed domain name for either a bona fide offering of goods and services pursuant to Policy ¶ 4(c)(i) or a legitimate noncommercial or fair use pursuant to Policy ¶ 4(c)(iii). [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 5:39 am
The bottom line of my essay is that the Calabresi-Hirji proposal is big-C constitutional and small-c anti-constitutional. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 8:35 am
Oct. 14, 2016)The plaintiff here, an app maker with a registered mark for Spy Phone for a monitoring app, squeaks past dismissal of its trademark secondary liability claim, and gets a win on §230(c)(2)(A) by alleging that Google acted in bad faith—another for Eric Goldman’s tally. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 12:24 pm
September 29, 2008 9:59 AMAnonymous Phil C said... [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:18 am
The Honorable Paul C. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 11:22 pm
Sounds good, so why doesn't she like it? [read post]
30 Mar 2006, 7:59 pm
Alternatively, Section 35(c) allows the plaintiff to elect to recover statutory damages in the amount of $500 to $100,000 per counterfeit mark per type of goods or services sold, or, if the court finds that the use of the counterfeit mark was willful, up to $1,000,000 (Note: the statutory award is not multiplied by the number of counterfeit items sold or offered for sale - e.g. whether only one clarinet or 1,000 clarinets were sold under the NORMANDY… [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 5:58 am
Contact the Chinese company and attempt to purchase the mark. c. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 12:25 am
A likelihood of dilution requires affirmative answers to three questions: (a) whether the Opposer’s mark is famous; (b) whether the mark became famous prior to the Applicant’s application filing date; and (c) whether the Applicant’s mark is likely to blur (reduce) the distinctiveness of Opposer’s mark. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 1:49 pm
Peter Julian MP (NDP) has raised the possibility of such division on Bill C-86 as a point of order. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 7:10 am
Word Mark 5974325 S~CURVE 5973146 FLYING SWINE 5974308 MICHIANA VIP MD 5973023 MATHOO’S 5972954 KYNGIN 5972709 TEEPOWERS 5972483 URBAN LAVA 5972482 SOAPSTONE MIST 5972363 5972353 WARRIOR RACK 5972340 ZINGARI MAN 5972331 ZINGARI MAN 5972274 BLACKTAIL 5972259 SHOWER ROD BUDDY 5972246 MUSTACHE MAFIA 5972229 STICK TO STAY 5972195 5EM5 5972107 BRING YOUR OWN BLOCKCHAIN 5972098 SIMBA CHAIN 5972086 SERVICE BROS. 5971972 TYRAN GAMES 5971865 SALAMANDER SERIES 5974303 GML 5971735 CN CAMRON… [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 12:46 pm
” 16 CFR § 437.1(c) (defining business opportunity). [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 9:16 pm
The subtitle is The Problem Solvers Who Turned the Tide in the Second World War which is perhaps a bit closer to the mark except you could say that everybody was a problem solver from George C. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 10:00 pm
Well, last month marked a significant milestone in the work to turn the UPC Agreement into a functioning court as the Preparatory Committee took some of the last of the key framework decisions to shape the Court. [read post]
23 Nov 2012, 12:00 am
In the European Union a consistent line of CJEU decisions including L’Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie, L’Oréal (UK) Limited v eBay International AG, eBay Europe SARL and eBay (UK) Limited Case C-324/09 (IPKat posts here, here and here), means that can usually be determined by analysis of whether or not the average consumer of the goods or services would regard the website as being aimed and… [read post]
